Scan a site

퀘이사존 (quasarzone.com) looks like an online shop, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2016. It is built with jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #17,255 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #191,350

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#17,255list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#191,350list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with jQuery, Lottie and Slick and 1 more.

  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 80
    <script src="https://img2.quasarzone.com/homepage/web13/themes/quasarzone/js/lib/jquery-3.7.1.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • LottieJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 2856
    <script src="https://img2.quasarzone.com/homepage/web13/themes/quasarzone/js/lib/lottie.min.js">
    Popular sites using Lottie Is this wrong? Report it
  • SlickJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 82
    <script src="https://img2.quasarzone.com/homepage/web13/themes/quasarzone/js/lib/slick.js">
    Popular sites using Slick Is this wrong? Report it
  • Moment.jsJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 94
    <script src="https://img2.quasarzone.com/homepage/web13/themes/admin/vendors/bower_components/moment/min/moment.min.js">
    Popular sites using Moment.js Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (12)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Analytics and more.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered17 Jul 2016, 10 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: 퀘이사존 QUASARZONEPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Google Analytics, Microsoft ClarityNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered17 Jul 2016, 10 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings5 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Online shop.

In its own words퀘이사존 QUASARZONE하드웨어, PC, 컴퓨터, CPU, VGA, 그래픽카드, 오버클럭, 라이젠, 지포스, 벤치마크

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 10356
<a href="https://store.sony.co.kr/products/gaming"></a>
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 11872
<a href="https://pc-factory.co.kr/shop/estimatepc.html"></a>
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 16152
<a href="http://www.jaywork.co.kr/product/list.php?cate=0555|"></a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured data퀘이사존 QUASARZONE
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 435
"name": "퀘이사존 QUASARZONE"
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts
Its summary for AI assistants퀘이사존은 하드웨어 리뷰, IT 뉴스, 핫딜 정보, 자유토론을 아우르는 한국 대표 IT 커뮤니티입니다.Read it in full

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks ClaudeBot, GPTBot, Google-Extended, CCBot and 4 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks PerplexityBot and ExaBot to stay away.
Show evidence (10)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 42
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 56
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 62
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 65
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 68
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 71
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 74
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 45
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 77
User-agent: ExaBot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
퀘이사존
Language
Korean (ko)
What it tells search engines
WebSite, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • Organization퀘이사존 QUASARZONE

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI: it scores 86 of 100.

It keeps 10 of 51 AI crawlers out, for training and for answers: the site’s choice, never scored.

86of 100

AI readiness

AI-friendly

It says what it is in structured data and lists its pages.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly

To reach Agent-ready:Files for AI agents +10

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

56/58
  • Text without scripts
  • Title and description
  • Structured data
  • llms.txt
  • Markdown copy

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 89% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 30 Oct 2026

What to fix

Optional: 3 fixes few sites have yetup to +14 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://quasarzone.com for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://quasarzone.com asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 65 linesFound
  • SitemapListed in robots.txt, and it lists 60 sitemapsFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 33
    Sitemap: https://quasarzone.com/sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts34,021 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    퀘이사존 QUASARZONE LIVE 전체서비스 로그인을 해주세요 작성글 쪽지 스크랩 내 레벨 출석체크 프로필 보기 내 정보 차단 공지 2026년 10월 4주차 영구 제재 명단 전체메뉴 인기/전체 인기글🔥 전체글💬 이벤트/특가 이벤트 체험단 특가/예판 라이브판매 공식콘텐츠 공식기사 리뷰 벤치마크 기획기사 게임기사 리포트/취재 리포트 컴퓨텍스 퀘이사존…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtFound: “퀘이사존 (Quasarzone)”Found
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · llms.txt, line 3
    > 퀘이사존은 하드웨어 리뷰, IT 뉴스, 핫딜 정보, 자유토론을 아우르는 한국 대표 IT 커뮤니티입니다.
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 38
    <title>퀘이사존 QUASARZONE</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 424
    <meta name="description" content="하드웨어, PC, 컴퓨터, CPU, VGA, 그래픽카드, 오버클럭, 라이젠, 지포스, 벤치마크">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: WebSite and OrganizationFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 435
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Google, Apple and Common Crawl kept out, Anthropic, Meta and ByteDance partly; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchPerplexity partly; the rest let inPartly
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 56To answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotline 36ChatGPT-Userline 39
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsPartlyClaudeBotline 42, kept outanthropic-ailet inClaude-Weblet inTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsKept outGoogle-Extendedline 59To answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchPartlyPerplexityBotline 45, kept outPerplexity-Userlet in
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsPartlymeta-externalagentline 71, kept outFacebookBotlet inTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsKept outApplebot-Extendedline 74To answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsLet inAmazonbotTo answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsKept outCCBotline 62To answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsPartlyBytespiderline 65, kept outTikTokSpiderlet inTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

2 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai and ExaBot.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 32% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

92 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

92of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 10 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2016.

  1. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

937 checks on 30 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#17,255list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#191,350list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
jQuery, Lottie, Slick, Moment.js

And 12 more around it (CDN, Security, DNS, Analytics), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

92of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about quasarzone.com

What is quasarzone.com?

퀘이사존 describes itself: “하드웨어, PC, 컴퓨터, CPU, VGA, 그래픽카드, 오버클럭, 라이젠, 지포스, 벤치마크” It looks like an online shop. See the evidence

How old is quasarzone.com?

Its domain was registered on 17 Jul 2016, 10 years ago. See the evidence

What is quasarzone.com built with?

It is built with jQuery; we found 16 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is quasarzone.com?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was quasarzone.com made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind quasarzone.com?

Its structured data names 퀘이사존 QUASARZONE. See the evidence

More sites like this: online shop

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 30 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share quasarzone.com

The result describes what we found on 30 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.