Scan a site

Wehkamp

wehkamp.nl

Scanned Fresh937 checks

92of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Online shopWehkamp | online warenhuis | vandaag besteld, morgen in huisMode voor dames, heren en kinderen. Meubels en woonaccessoires. Altijd de beste deals. Snelle bezorging en makkelijk retourneren.
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withReact, Envoy15 technologies foundTrust signals4 of 7 foundDomain registered 31 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

Wehkamp (wehkamp.nl) looks like an online shop, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1995. It is built with React and Envoy; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #16,202 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #35,769

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#16,202list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#35,769list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with React and Envoy.

  • ReactFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1
    16 attributes starting with data-react-helmet
    Popular sites using React Is this wrong? Report it
  • EnvoyWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-envoy-upstream-service-time: 227
    Popular sites using Envoy Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (13)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered27 Jun 1995, 31 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered27 Jun 1995, 31 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Online shop.

In its own wordsWehkamp | online warenhuis | vandaag besteld, morgen in huisMode voor dames, heren en kinderen. Meubels en woonaccessoires. Altijd de beste deals. Snelle bezorging en makkelijk retourneren.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q2644526: Wehkamp, online shop
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 84
<a href="https://www.wehkamp.nl/shop/?collectie=kerstcadeaus">alle cadeaus</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • WikidataWehkamp

Wikidata: Owned by Omoda; based in Zwolle, Netherlands; founded by Herman Wehkamp.

Its Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and Pinterest accounts are the ones Wikidata lists.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q2644526: Wehkamp
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Wehkamp: Dutch online retailer for fashion, home & living and beauty · online shop, business · since 1952

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks meta-externalagent to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 24
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Wehkamp
Language
Dutch (nl)
What it tells search engines
BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, PostalAddress, ContactPoint, Place, AboutPage, WebSite, SearchAction

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI: it scores 82 of 100.

It keeps 1 AI training crawler out, and lets AI assistants in: the site’s choice, never scored.

82of 100

AI readiness

AI-friendly

It says what it is in structured data and lists its pages.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly

To reach Agent-ready:Files for AI agents +10

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 56% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 30 Oct 2026
Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.wehkamp.nl for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.wehkamp.nl/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.wehkamp.nl asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 133 linesFound
  • SitemapListed in robots.txt, and it lists 29 sitemapsFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 28
    Sitemap: https://www.wehkamp.nl/sitemap_index.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts19,839 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Wehkamp | online warenhuis | vandaag besteld, morgen in huis Naar hoofdinhoud woondeals: laatste week tot -30% Menu openen Kerst Dames Heren Kinderen Wonen Beauty Zoeken binnen wehkamp Optioneel mijn…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1
    <title>Wehkamp | online warenhuis | vandaag besteld, morgen in huis</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 1
    <meta name="description" content="Mode voor dames, heren en kinderen. Meubels en woonaccessoires. Altijd de beste deals. Snelle bezorging en makkelijk retourneren.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, PostalAddress and 5 moreFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 104
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingMeta partly; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsLet inGPTBotTo answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsLet inClaudeBotanthropic-aiClaude-WebTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsPartlymeta-externalagentline 24, kept outFacebookBotlet inTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsLet inAmazonbotTo answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsLet inCCBotTo answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsLet inBytespiderTikTokSpiderTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 32% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

92 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

92of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 31 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1995; first archived in 1997.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 30 of 30 years · see the first capture

  1. 1997: captured
  2. 1998: captured
  3. 1999: captured
  4. 2000: captured
  5. 2001: captured
  6. 2002: captured
  7. 2003: captured
  8. 2004: captured
  9. 2005: captured
  10. 2006: captured
  11. 2007: captured
  12. 2008: captured
  13. 2009: captured
  14. 2010: captured
  15. 2011: captured
  16. 2012: captured
  17. 2013: captured
  18. 2014: captured
  19. 2015: captured
  20. 2016: captured
  21. 2017: captured
  22. 2018: captured
  23. 2019: captured
  24. 2020: captured
  25. 2021: captured
  26. 2022: captured
  27. 2023: captured
  28. 2024: captured
  29. 2025: captured
  30. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

937 checks on 30 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#16,202list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#35,769list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Framework
React
Web server
Envoy

And 13 more around it (CDN, Security, DNS, Email), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyFound
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECFound
  • Certificate authoritiesFound
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

92of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about wehkamp.nl

What is wehkamp.nl?

Wehkamp describes itself: “Mode voor dames, heren en kinderen. Meubels en woonaccessoires. Altijd de beste deals. Snelle bezorging en makkelijk retourneren.” It looks like an online shop. See the evidence

How old is wehkamp.nl?

Its domain was registered on 27 Jun 1995, 31 years ago. See the evidence

What is wehkamp.nl built with?

It is built with React and Envoy; we found 15 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is wehkamp.nl?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was wehkamp.nl made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind wehkamp.nl?

Wikidata names Wehkamp. See the evidence

More sites like this: online shop

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 30 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share wehkamp.nl

The result describes what we found on 30 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.