Scan a site

ugg.com looks like a company or service site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1997. We couldn’t read its page: it turned our scanner away.

This site turns automated visitors away, as many large sites do, so we couldn’t read its page. What public records say is below; the score needs the page.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #19,683 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #22,311

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#19,683list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#22,311list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Varnish.

  • VarnishWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    via: 1.1 varnish
    Popular sites using Varnish Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (8)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered25 Sept 1997, 29 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • About pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Privacy policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • TermsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Refund or returns policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Contact detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Company detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Payment providersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • TrackersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered25 Sept 1997, 29 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsBot protection answered instead of the siteCouldn’t check
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Company or service site.

We couldn’t read the page, so there are no words of its own to quote.

From what Wikidata says it is: we couldn’t read the page.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q1138480: UGG, business
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • WikidataUGG

Wikidata: Part of Deckers Outdoor Corporation; based in Goleta, United States.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q1138480: UGG
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • UGG: American brand and business · business · since 1978

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Not given
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

We couldn’t read the page, so we couldn’t look for traces.

AI traces: Couldn’t check

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

It lets every AI crawler in.

We couldn’t read its page: its bot protection turned our scanner away.

We couldn’t check enough of the site to score its AI readiness: the score needs its home page.

What to fix

Optional: a fix few sites have yet

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.ugg.com for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.

Left out of the score, as we couldn’t check them: Text without scripts, Search listing, Title and description, Structured data, llms.txt, Links for AI tools, Markdown copy.

Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 182 linesFound
  • Sitemap68 listed in robots.txtFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 113
    Sitemap: https://www.ugg.com/sitemap_1.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Search listingThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scriptsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Markdown copyThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • llms.txtThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Title and descriptionThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Structured dataThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Sign-in for AI agentsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Auth.mdThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • AI catalogThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • MCP serverThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agent cardThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agent SkillsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreLet in
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

Its robots.txt names none of the 24 crawlers of the 10 AI companies we know, so it lets every one in.

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

  • Content SignalsNoneNot found
  • A “noai” tagIts bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

If this is your site

  • Decide what AI may do with the site, and say it in robots.txt. Write the lines

Like 74% of the 780 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. Of the 964 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 10% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

No score: we couldn’t read the page, and outside records alone would mislead.

Why each part scored what it did
Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1997; first archived in 1996.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 30 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: no capture
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: captured
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured

The web archive saw this address on 31 Dec 1996, before its current registration on 25 Sept 1997. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

933 checks on 2 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

Couldn’t checkWe couldn’t read the page.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#19,683list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#22,311list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Web server
Varnish

And 8 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, SEO), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageCouldn’t check
  • About pageCouldn’t check
  • Privacy policyCouldn’t check
  • TermsCouldn’t check
  • Refund or returns policyCouldn’t check
  • Contact detailsCouldn’t check
  • Company detailsCouldn’t check
  • Payment providersCouldn’t check
  • TrackersCouldn’t check

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersCouldn’t check
  • Software versionsCouldn’t check
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECFound
  • Certificate authoritiesFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →

Questions about ugg.com

What is ugg.com?

It looks like a company or service site. See the evidence

How old is ugg.com?

Its domain was registered on 25 Sept 1997, 29 years ago. See the evidence

How popular is ugg.com?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Who is behind ugg.com?

Wikidata names UGG. See the evidence

More sites like this: company or service site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 2 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share ugg.com

The result describes what we found on 2 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.