tovima.gr is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 2005. We couldn’t read its page: it turned our scanner away.

This site turns automated visitors away, as many large sites do, so we couldn’t read its page. What public records say is below; the score needs the page.

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #24,484 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #19,263

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#24,484list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#19,263list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, DNS, Email, SEO.

Everything else it uses (4)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO.

Was this answer right?

We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • About pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Privacy policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • TermsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Refund or returns policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Contact detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Company detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • Payment providersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
  • TrackersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry didn’t answerCouldn’t checkdomain registry
  • First seen online29 Jun 2005, 21 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsBot protection answered instead of the siteCouldn’t check
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

We couldn’t read the page, so we can’t say what it is.

We couldn’t read the page, so there are no words of its own to quote.

We couldn’t read the page, so we can’t say what kind of site it is.

Who is behind it

  • WikidataTo Vima

Wikidata: Owned by Alter Ego Media and Lambrakis Press Group; based in Athens, Greece.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q1440457: To Vima
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • To Vima: Greek daily newspaper · morning paper · since 1922

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Not given
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

We couldn’t read the page, so we couldn’t look for traces.

AI traces: Couldn’t check

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

It lets every AI crawler in.

We couldn’t read its page: its bot protection turned our scanner away.

We couldn’t check enough of the site to score its AI readiness: the score needs its home page.

What to fix

Optional: a fix few sites have yet
  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.tovima.gr for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.

Left out of the score, as we couldn’t check them: Text without scripts, Search listing, Title and description, Structured data, llms.txt, Links for AI tools, Markdown copy.

Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 13 linesFound
  • Sitemap5 listed in robots.txtFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 9
    Sitemap: https://www.tovima.gr/sitemap_index.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Search listingThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scriptsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Markdown copyThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • llms.txtThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Title and descriptionThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Structured dataThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Sign-in for AI agentsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Auth.mdThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • AI catalogThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • MCP serverThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agent cardThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agent SkillsThe site’s bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreLet in
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

Its robots.txt names none of the 24 crawlers of the 10 AI companies we know, so it lets every one in.

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

  • Content SignalsNoneNot found
  • A “noai” tagIts bot protection turned our scanner awayCouldn’t check

If this is your site

  • Decide what AI may do with the site, and say it in robots.txt. Write the lines

Like 75% of the 1,305 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. Of the 1,611 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 11% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 10% have an llms.txt and 4% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

No score: we couldn’t read the page, and outside records alone would mislead.

Why each part scored what it did
Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 2005.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 22 of 22 years · see the first capture

  1. 2005: captured
  2. 2006: captured
  3. 2007: captured
  4. 2008: captured
  5. 2009: captured
  6. 2010: captured
  7. 2011: captured
  8. 2012: captured
  9. 2013: captured
  10. 2014: captured
  11. 2015: captured
  12. 2016: captured
  13. 2017: captured
  14. 2018: captured
  15. 2019: captured
  16. 2020: captured
  17. 2021: captured
  18. 2022: captured
  19. 2023: captured
  20. 2024: captured
  21. 2025: captured
  22. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

933 checks on 7 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Questions about tovima.gr

How old is tovima.gr?

The web archive first saw it on 29 Jun 2005, 21 years ago. See the evidence

How popular is tovima.gr?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Who is behind tovima.gr?

Wikidata names To Vima. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 7 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.