Scan a site

Süddeutsche.de (sueddeutsche.de) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 1996. It is built with Emotion; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #2,843 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #1,012

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#2,843list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#1,012list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Emotion.

  • EmotionCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 45
    334 attributes starting with data-emotion
    Popular sites using Emotion Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (12)

Around it: CDN, Email, Tag manager, Advertising and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsPhone on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 116Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:+49••••••••55">08•/••••-••55</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home pageFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • Contact detailsPhone on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 116Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:+49••••••••55">08•/••••-••55</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: TaboolaNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry publishes no registration date, only when the record last changed (16 Apr 2026)Couldn’t checkWHOIS (whois.denic.de)
  • First seen online26 Dec 1996, 29 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsAktuelle Nachrichten und Kommentare - SZ.deNachrichten aus Deutschland und aller Welt mit Kommentaren und Hintergrundberichten.

Our reading of the page, high confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q158870: Süddeutsche Zeitung, daily newspaper
Exhibit 2 · its own title or description
Aktuelle Nachrichten und Kommentare - SZ.de · Süddeutsche.de · Nachrichten aus Deutschland und aller Welt mit Kommentaren und Hintergrundberichten.
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 74
<a href="https://www.sueddeutsche.de/news?search=&sort=date&dep%5B%5D=politik&dep%5B%5D=wirtschaft&dep%5B%5D=panorama&typ%5B%5D=article&all%5B%5D=sys&all%5B%5D=time">Newsticker</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • WikidataSüddeutsche Zeitung

Wikidata: Based in Munich, Germany.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q158870: Süddeutsche Zeitung
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks GPTBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot, Claude-Web and 3 more to stay away.
  • AI training: names Amazonbot with rules for some pages.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User and PerplexityBot to stay away.
Show evidence (10)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 70
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 78
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 81
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 84
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 90
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 96
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 102
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 99
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 105
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 108
User-agent: Amazonbot
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Süddeutsche.de
Language
German (de)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

79 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

79OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10site name differs from the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 1996.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 31 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: captured
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: captured
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

928 checks on 13 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#2,843list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 5,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#1,012list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CSS framework
Emotion

And 12 more around it (CDN, Email, Tag manager, Advertising), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyFound
  • Contact detailsPartly
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredCouldn’t check
  • First seen onlineNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

79OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 13 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share sueddeutsche.de

The result describes what we found on 13 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.