Scan a site

AajTak

aajtak.in

Scanned 925 checks

100OF 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteHindi news, हिंदी न्यूज़ , Hindi Samachar, हिंदी समाचार, Latest News in Hindi, Breaking News in Hindi, ताजा ख़बरें, Aaj Tak NewsAajTak: Hindi news (हिंदी समाचार) website, watch live tv coverages, Latest Khabar, Breaking news in Hindi of India, World, Sports, business, film and Entertainment. आज तक पर पढ़ें ताजा समाचार देश और दुनिया से, जाने व्यापार, बॉलीवुड, खेल और राजनीति के ख़बरें
PopularityTop 1KBuilt withSign in with Google, Varnish, jQuery21 technologies foundTrust signals6 of 7 foundDomain registered 21 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

AajTak (aajtak.in) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2005. It is built with Sign in with Google, Varnish and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 1K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #1,554 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #30,565

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#1,554list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 1,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#30,565list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with jQuery, Swiper and lazysizes and 2 more.

  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1608
    <script src="https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/aajtak/resource/js/jquery.min.js?v=20072022-79">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1616
    <script src="https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/aajtak/resource/js/swiper.min.js?v=20072022-79">
    Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it
  • lazysizesJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1609
    <script src="https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/aajtak/resource/js/lazysizes.min.js?v=20072022-79">
    Popular sites using lazysizes Is this wrong? Report it
  • Sign in with GoogleBackendShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 2371
    <script src="https://accounts.google.com/gsi/client">
    Popular sites using Sign in with Google Is this wrong? Report it
  • VarnishWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-varnish: 149242781
    Popular sites using Varnish Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (16)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

6 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered6 Jan 2005, 21 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 3194Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "t•••@intoday.com"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home pageFound
  • About pageLinked from the home pageFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 3194Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "t•••@intoday.com"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsName: AajTak, address givenFound
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers7 analytics and advertising tools: Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Chartbeat, Comscore, Google Ad Manager, Taboola, Amazon AdsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered6 Jan 2005, 21 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsHindi news, हिंदी न्यूज़ , Hindi Samachar, हिंदी समाचार, Latest News in Hindi, Breaking News in Hindi, ताजा ख़बरें, Aaj Tak NewsAajTak: Hindi news (हिंदी समाचार) website, watch live tv coverages, Latest Khabar, Breaking news in Hindi of India, World, Sports, business, film and Entertainment. आज तक पर पढ़ें ताजा समाचार देश और दुनिया से, जाने व्यापार, बॉलीवुड, खेल और राजनीति के ख़बरें

Our reading of the page, high confidence.

Show evidence (4)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · its own title or description
Hindi news, हिंदी न्यूज़ , Hindi Samachar, हिंदी समाचार, Latest News in Hindi, Breaking News in Hindi, ताजा ख़बरें, Aaj Tak News · AajTak · AajTak: Hindi news (ह
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 609
<a href="https://www.aajtak.in/author/ai-anchors">अन्य AI एंकर्स</a>
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 1327
<a href="https://podcasts.aajtak.in/news-current-affairs/reporters-off-air/indaiyaa-balaoka-kae-vairaodha-paradarasana-kae-baica-janaanaesa-kaumaara-nae-ajataka-kae-raipaoratara-kao-kayaa-bataayaa-reporters-off-air-2666065-2026-10-09">इंडिया ब्लॉक के विरोध प्रदर्शन के बीच ज्ञानेश कुमार ने आजतक के रिपोर्टर को क्या बताया?: Reporters Off Air</a>
Exhibit 4 · visible text
…ी न्यूज़ , Hindi Samachar, हिंदी समाचार, Latest News in Hindi, Breaking News in Hindi, ताजा…
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataAajTak
  • copyright lineLiving Media India Limited
  • WikidataAaj Tak

Wikidata: Owned by TV Today Network and India Today Group; based in Noida, India.

Its Facebook and X accounts are the ones Wikidata lists.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 3194
"name": "AajTak"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 1539
Copyright © 2026 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights:
Exhibit 3 · Wikidata
Q3396358: Aaj Tak
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Aaj Tak: Hindi news channel · news broadcasting, television channel · since 1999

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
AajTak
Language
Hindi (hi)
What it tells search engines
itgd_cdp, WebSite, Organization, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, ItemList, SiteNavigationElement

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationAajTakNoida, IN

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

100 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

100OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page30 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page30 / 30contact page linked · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 21 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2005; first archived in 2005.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 20 of 22 years · see the first capture

  1. 2005: captured
  2. 2006: no capture
  3. 2007: no capture
  4. 2008: captured
  5. 2009: captured
  6. 2010: captured
  7. 2011: captured
  8. 2012: captured
  9. 2013: captured
  10. 2014: captured
  11. 2015: captured
  12. 2016: captured
  13. 2017: captured
  14. 2018: captured
  15. 2019: captured
  16. 2020: captured
  17. 2021: captured
  18. 2022: captured
  19. 2023: captured
  20. 2024: captured
  21. 2025: captured
  22. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

925 checks on 10 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 1KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#1,554list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 1,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#30,565list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
jQuery, Swiper, lazysizes
Backend
Sign in with Google
Web server
Varnish

And 16 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsFound
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

100OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page30 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 10 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share aajtak.in

The result describes what we found on 10 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.