Scan a site

sports.fr is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2003. It is built with WordPress and Slick; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #19,904 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #48,712

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#19,904list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#48,712list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with WordPress and Slick.

  • WordPressCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 18
    <link rel="preload" href="/wp-content/themes/sport/assets/fonts/Poppins-Medium.woff2">
    Popular sites using WordPress Is this wrong? Report it
  • SlickJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 185
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.sports.fr/wp-content/cache/min/1/wp-content/themes/core/assets/stylesheets/slick.css?ver=1793512360">
    Popular sites using Slick Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (9)

Around it: CDN, Performance, DNS, Email and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

1 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered16 Apr 2003, 23 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold itPartly
  • TermsNot linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold itPartly
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold itPartly
  • TermsNot linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold itPartly
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: Sports.frPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered16 Apr 2003, 23 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Sports.fr - Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...”.

In its own wordsSports.fr - Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • structured dataSports.fr
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 140
"name": "Sports.fr"
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Sports.fr
Language
French (fr-FR)
What it tells search engines
CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationSports.fr

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI and its agents: it scores 92 of 100.

It lets every AI crawler in: the site’s choice, never scored.

92of 100

AI readiness

Agent-ready

It offers AI agents a way to use it.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly
  4. Agent-ready

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

10/10
  • Files for AI agents

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 97% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 2 Nov 2026

What to fix

Optional: 3 fixes few sites have yetup to +8 points

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.sports.fr/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.sports.fr asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 52 linesFound
  • Sitemap2 listed in robots.txt, and the first lists 50 pagesFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 3
    Sitemap: https://www.sports.fr/sitemap-news.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts6,954 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Sports.fr - Toute l ' actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis... Football.fr football365.fr 🎧 Podcasts Sport en France Rejoins-nous sur : Football Cyclisme Rugby Tennis M é dias…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 125
    <title>Sports.fr - Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 126
    <meta name="description" content="Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite and 1 moreFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 140
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsFound, for www.sports.frFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource, line 1
    {"resource":"https:\/\/www.sports.fr\/wp-json\/mcp\/mcp-oauth-server","authorization_servers":["https:\/\/www.sports.fr"],"bearer_methods_supported":["header"],…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreLet in
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

Its robots.txt names none of the 24 crawlers of the 10 AI companies we know, so it lets every one in.

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

If this is your site

  • Decide what AI may do with the site, and say it in robots.txt. Write the lines

Like 71% of the 520 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. Of the 650 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 2% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

78 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

78of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy: not linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold it · terms: not linked on its own; a legal page is linked, which may hold it · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 23 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2003; first archived in 2000.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 27 of 27 years · see the first capture

  1. 2000: captured
  2. 2001: captured
  3. 2002: captured
  4. 2003: captured
  5. 2004: captured
  6. 2005: captured
  7. 2006: captured
  8. 2007: captured
  9. 2008: captured
  10. 2009: captured
  11. 2010: captured
  12. 2011: captured
  13. 2012: captured
  14. 2013: captured
  15. 2014: captured
  16. 2015: captured
  17. 2016: captured
  18. 2017: captured
  19. 2018: captured
  20. 2019: captured
  21. 2020: captured
  22. 2021: captured
  23. 2022: captured
  24. 2023: captured
  25. 2024: captured
  26. 2025: captured
  27. 2026: captured

The web archive saw this address on 6 Jul 2000, before its current registration on 16 Apr 2003. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

935 checks on 2 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#19,904list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#48,712list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
WordPress
JavaScript library
Slick

And 9 more around it (CDN, Performance, DNS, Email), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyPartly
  • TermsPartly
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

78of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about sports.fr

What is sports.fr?

sports.fr describes itself: “Toute l'actualité sportive : football, basket, nba, rugby, tennis...” See the evidence

How old is sports.fr?

Its domain was registered on 16 Apr 2003, 23 years ago. See the evidence

What is sports.fr built with?

It is built with WordPress and Slick; we found 11 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is sports.fr?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was sports.fr made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind sports.fr?

Its structured data names Sports.fr. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 2 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share sports.fr

The result describes what we found on 2 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.