snaptube.com
In its own wordsService Availability
In its own wordsService Availability
snaptube.com is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2006. It uses Cloudflare, Alibaba Cloud DNS and Google Workspace; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before JavaScript runs. Sites drawn by JavaScript show fewer signals until we can render them in a browser.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #9,382 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #352,688
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #9,382 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #352,688 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, DNS, Email, SEO.
Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO.
cf-ray: a4ef9c480ce3d44d-SEA
snaptube.com NS vip8.alidns.com.
snaptube.com MX 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com.
snaptube.com TXT google-site-verification=xPeLsSZWtqzyyCV2NZb77B1Q6_OBVNJ-KPfGXtz80iU
We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “Service Availability”.
In its own wordsService Availability
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
80 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Scored on the parts we could check.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2006; first archived in 2008.
In the web archive: captured in 17 of 19 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
925 checks on 23 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Its domain was registered on 19 Jul 2006, 20 years ago. See the evidence
It uses Cloudflare, Alibaba Cloud DNS and Google Workspace; we found 4 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 23 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.