slrclub.com
In its own wordsSLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티
In its own wordsSLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티
slrclub.com is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2001. It is built with jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #16,422 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #247,961
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #16,422 | list of 27 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 10,000 | Sep 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #247,961 | list of 28 Oct 2026 |
Built with jQuery.
<script src="/js/jquery-1.8.3.min.js">
Around it: CDN, Security, Analytics, Advertising and more.
cf-ray: a528803999eef153-ORD
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=6LeMuQUoAAAAAC3pfiBtZ62JYG4Q8nqXtnVi4leC&onload=onloadCallback&render=explicit">
<script src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-08KZK8LRKP">
<script async="" src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-…
slrclub.com TXT google-site-verification=86295cYUhYecz0h_DTItZszBnzcbWyZKkEJ183B3mO4
3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “SLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티”.
In its own wordsSLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
COPYRIGHT (C) SLRCLUB
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
User-agent: * · Disallow: /
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
AI can find it, but not yet read it well: it scores 60 of 100.
It keeps every AI crawler out: the site’s choice, never scored.
AI readiness
Search engines may list it and crawlers may read it.
To reach Readable:Title and description +8
Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.
Below the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, which is 72.
Structured data
Now None found.
Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.
Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.
Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://www.slrclub.com as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.
Title and descriptionIn part
Now A title, no description.
Give the home page a title and a meta description in its HTML.
Why it matters: A title and a description are the words AI tools and search engines quote first.
<title>SLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티</title>
Give the home page of https://www.slrclub.com a descriptive <title> and a <meta name="description" content="…"> of about 150 characters that says what the site is and offers (we found: a title, no description). Put both in the HTML the server sends, not set later by scripts.
Files for AI agents
Now None of the 8 we look for.
If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.
Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.
If AI agents could use https://www.slrclub.com for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
Links for AI tools
Now None in the home page’s headers.
Point AI tools to the site’s files in the home page’s Link header.
Why it matters: A Link header points AI tools to a site’s files from any page, without guessing addresses.
Make the home page of https://www.slrclub.com send a Link header (RFC 8288) that points AI tools to the site’s files, for example: Link: </sitemap.xml>; rel="sitemap", </llms.txt>; rel="describedby"; type="text/plain". List only files the site serves.
Markdown copy
Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.
Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.
Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.
When a request to https://www.slrclub.com asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
Left out of the score, as we couldn’t check them: Sitemap, llms.txt.
SLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티 인기 검색어 순위 1 라이카 2 니콘 3 사이트 4 후지 5 소니 6 부산 7 a7m5 8 캐논 자유게시판 정치게시판 포토스트림 소모임 시장정보 직접홍보 해외직구 성인게시판 가상화폐게시판 PC게시판 이슈토론방 자료실 SLR지식인 SLR회원랭킹 Canon Contax FujiFilm Hasselblad Kodak…
<title>SLR클럽, 디지털 사진가를 위한 커뮤니티</title>
Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.
GPTBotline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchKept outOAI-SearchBotline 25, for every crawlerChatGPT-Userline 25, for every crawlerClaudeBotline 25, for every crawleranthropic-ailine 25, for every crawlerClaude-Webline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchKept outClaude-SearchBotline 25, for every crawlerClaude-Userline 25, for every crawlerGoogle-Extendedline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchKept outGoogle-CloudVertexBotline 25, for every crawlerPerplexityBotline 25, for every crawlerPerplexity-Userline 25, for every crawlermeta-externalagentline 25, for every crawlerFacebookBotline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchKept outmeta-externalfetcherline 25, for every crawlermeta-webindexerline 25, for every crawlerApplebot-Extendedline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchNone namedAmazonbotline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchKept outAmzn-SearchBotline 25, for every crawlerAmzn-Userline 25, for every crawlerCCBotline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchNone namedBytespiderline 25, for every crawlerTikTokSpiderline 25, for every crawlerTo answer people and searchNone namedMistralAI-Userline 25, for every crawler27 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai, cohere-training-data-crawler, Diffbot, Omgilibot, Omgili and 22 more.
It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.
Like 68% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?
We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.
82 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2001; first archived in 2001.
In the web archive: captured in 26 of 26 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
934 checks on 30 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Its domain was registered on 6 Feb 2001, 25 years ago. See the evidence
It is built with jQuery; we found 6 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Its copyright line names SLRCLUB. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 30 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.