skyscanner.fr

Scanned 1 Nov 2026Fresh934 checks

In its own wordsLooks like: Software or appSkyscanner

skyscanner.fr looks like a software product or app, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2008. It is built with React; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

The page shows little text before its JavaScript runs, so we also read its own script (/sttc/px/captcha-v2/static/js/main.81dbcf5a.js) for traces.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Top 1KTop 10KTop 100KTop 1MOutside top 1M

Tranco: #19,246 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #76,938

Each list, with its date

Source	Says	As of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.	#19,246	list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.	Top 10,000	Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0	#76,938	list of 28 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with React.

ReactFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · script /sttc/px/captcha-v2/static/js/main.81dbcf5a.js
```
…){}}return null}var Q=Array.isArray,G=a.__CLIENT_INTERNALS_DO_NOT_USE_OR_WARN_USERS_THEY_CANNOT_UPGRADE,K=o.__DOM_INTERNALS_DO_NOT_USE_OR_WARN_…
```
Popular sites using React Is this wrong? Report it

Everything else it uses (6)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.

CloudflareCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
cf-ray: a53c6b1fbec9c8c6-EWR
```
Popular sites using Cloudflare Is this wrong? Report it
Amazon CloudFrontCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
x-amz-cf-id: JZ9Dqc6HfMFY1Ovww_CjH5LOAYtkmkGzRjKrgTDp9Jf7Ba6oupfIFw==
```
Popular sites using Amazon CloudFront Is this wrong? Report it
Amazon Route 53DNSShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
skyscanner.fr NS ns-1354.awsdns-41.org.
```
Popular sites using Amazon Route 53 Is this wrong? Report it
Microsoft 365EmailShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
skyscanner.fr MX 0 skyscanner-fr.mail.protection.outlook.com.
```
Popular sites using Microsoft 365 Is this wrong? Report it
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
skyscanner.fr TXT google-site-verification=FBqiTdj9d7yXOEVuAM4xjKkVBwUTWEDsJ82f9T3CnFo
```
Popular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report it
Meta BusinessBusiness toolsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
skyscanner.fr TXT facebook-domain-verification=pycc5e3br3vakjar0h2p1dnvr2r5qv
```
Popular sites using Meta Business Is this wrong? Report it

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Domain registered15 Jul 2008, 18 years agoNoted
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted

Every signal we looked at

On the site

Contact pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
About pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Privacy policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
TermsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Refund or returns policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Contact detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Company detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Payment providersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
TrackersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check

Behind the site

Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
Domain registered15 Jul 2008, 18 years agoNoteddomain registry
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Software or app.

In its own wordsSkyscanner

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · Wikidata

Q1319169: Skyscanner, search engine

Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

WikidataSkyscanner

Wikidata: Owned by Trip.com Group; based in Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · Wikidata

Q1319169: Skyscanner

Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

Skyscanner: online travel company · business, travel website, search engine · since 2001

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

AI training: asks meta-externalagent to stay away.
AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 52

User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /

Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name: Not given
Language: English (en)
What it tells search engines: None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it, but not yet read it well: it scores 27 of 100.

It keeps 1 AI training crawler out, and lets AI assistants in: the site’s choice, never scored.

AI readiness

Findable

Search engines may list it and crawlers may read it.

Findable
2Readable
3AI-friendly
4Agent-ready

To reach Readable:Text without scripts +25 Title and description +8

Can AI find it?

20/32

Search listing
Sitemap
robots.txt
Links for AI tools

Can AI read it?

7/58

Text without scripts
Title and description
Structured data
llms.txt
Markdown copy

Can agents use it?

0/10

Files for AI agents

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Below the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, which is 72.

Checked 1 Nov 2026

What to fix

4 fixes, up to +55 points

Text without scripts

Now Little, 10 characters: scripts draw the rest.

Put the page’s text in its HTML, rendered on the server or at build time.

Details

Why it matters: Most AI crawlers don’t run scripts: they read only what the HTML holds.

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run

Skyscanner

Is this wrong? Report it

Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)

The home page of https://www.skyscanner.fr sends only 10 characters of text before its scripts run, so AI crawlers that don’t run JavaScript see an almost empty page. Make the server send the page’s content in its HTML: render it on the server, or prerender each page at build time (static generation), so its headings, text and links are in the HTML before any script runs. Keep the interactive parts working as they do now.

+25points

Structured data

Now None found.

Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.

Details

Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.

Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)

Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://www.skyscanner.fr as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.

+12points

Sitemap
Now Listed in robots.txt, but it isn’t a sitemap.
Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.
Details
Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 1
Sitemap: https://www.skyscanner.fr/sitemap.xml
Is this wrong? Report it
Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
Add an XML sitemap at https://www.skyscanner.fr/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://www.skyscanner.fr/sitemap.xml" to https://www.skyscanner.fr/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
+10points
Title and descriptionIn part
Now A title, no description.
Give the home page a title and a meta description in its HTML.
Details
Why it matters: A title and a description are the words AI tools and search engines quote first.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1
<title>Skyscanner</title>
Is this wrong? Report it
Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
Give the home page of https://www.skyscanner.fr a descriptive <title> and a <meta name="description" content="…"> of about 150 characters that says what the site is and offers (we found: a title, no description). Put both in the HTML the server sends, not set later by scripts.
+8points

Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

Files for AI agents

Now None of the 8 we look for.

If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

Details

Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)

If AI agents could use https://www.skyscanner.fr for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.

+10optional

llms.txt
Now None found.
Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.
Details
Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.
Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
Create https://www.skyscanner.fr/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
+4optional
Links for AI tools
Now None in the home page’s headers.
Point AI tools to the site’s files in the home page’s Link header.
Details
Why it matters: A Link header points AI tools to a site’s files from any page, without guessing addresses.
Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
Make the home page of https://www.skyscanner.fr send a Link header (RFC 8288) that points AI tools to the site’s files, for example: Link: </sitemap.xml>; rel="sitemap", </llms.txt>; rel="describedby"; type="text/plain". List only files the site serves.
+2optional
Markdown copy
Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.
Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.
Details
Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.
Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
When a request to https://www.skyscanner.fr asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
+2optional

Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

robots.txtFound, 372 linesFound
SitemapListed in robots.txt, but it isn’t a sitemapPartly
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 1
Sitemap: https://www.skyscanner.fr/sitemap.xml
Is this wrong? Report it
Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

Text without scriptsLittle, 10 characters: scripts draw the restNot found
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
Skyscanner
Is this wrong? Report it
Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
llms.txtNone foundNot found
Title and descriptionA title, no descriptionPartly
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1
<title>Skyscanner</title>
Is this wrong? Report it
Structured dataNone foundNot found

Can agents use it?

API catalogNone foundNot found
Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
Auth.mdNone foundNot found
AI catalogNone foundNot found
MCP serverNone foundNot found
Agent cardNone foundNot found
Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

AI trainingMeta partly; the rest let inPartly
AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in

Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsLet inGPTBotTo answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsLet inClaudeBotanthropic-aiClaude-WebTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
MetaMeta AITo train its modelsPartlymeta-externalagentline 52, kept outFacebookBotlet inTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
AmazonTo train its modelsLet inAmazonbotTo answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsLet inCCBotTo answer people and searchNone named
ByteDanceTo train its modelsLet inBytespiderTikTokSpiderTo answer people and searchNone named
MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 29% of the 435 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 555 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 2% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Score breakdown

Site Score

93 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 18 years ago

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 10site name matches the domain · no description · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2008; first archived in 2007.

12 Oct 2007First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
15 Jul 2008Domain registeredRDAP
1 Nov 2026This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 20 of 20 years · see the first capture

2007: captured
2008: captured
2009: captured
2010: captured
2011: captured
2012: captured
2013: captured
2014: captured
2015: captured
2016: captured
2017: captured
2018: captured
2019: captured
2020: captured
2021: captured
2022: captured
2023: captured
2024: captured
2025: captured
2026: captured

The web archive saw this address on 12 Oct 2007, before its current registration on 15 Jul 2008. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts

Since our previous scan: This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.

This scan, in numbers

934 checks on 1 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Questions about skyscanner.fr

What is skyscanner.fr?

It looks like a software product or app. See the evidence

How old is skyscanner.fr?

Its domain was registered on 15 Jul 2008, 18 years ago. See the evidence

What is skyscanner.fr built with?

It is built with React; we found 7 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is skyscanner.fr?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was skyscanner.fr made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind skyscanner.fr?

Wikidata names Skyscanner. See the evidence

More sites like this: software or app

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 1 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you

Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.