Scan a site

shamela.ws looks like a software product or app, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 2006. It is built with Bootstrap; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #17,900 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #68,612

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#17,900list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#68,612list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Bootstrap.

  • BootstrapCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · stylesheet /assets/css/base.css
    /*! * Bootstrap v3.3.6 (http://getbootstrap.com) * Copyri…
    Popular sites using Bootstrap Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (6)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Analytics, SEO and more.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

0 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1, as Cloudflare’s email protection decodes itMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:m•••@shamela.ws">اتصل بنا</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1, as Cloudflare’s email protection decodes itMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:m•••@shamela.ws">اتصل بنا</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: Google AnalyticsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry didn’t answerCouldn’t checkdomain registry
  • First seen online8 Apr 2006, 20 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings1 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Software or app.

In its own wordsالمكتبة الشاملةالموقع الرسمي لمشروع المكتبة الشاملة.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q12194101: Al-Maktaba Al-Shamela, application software
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • WikidataAl-Maktaba Al-Shamela
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q12194101: Al-Maktaba Al-Shamela
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot and 11 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks Google-CloudVertexBot to stay away.
  • Content signals: search=yes,ai-train=no,use=reference.
Show evidence (17)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 41
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 44
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 47
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 50
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 53
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 56
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 62
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 65
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 68
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 74
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 96
User-agent: Cotoyogi · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 99
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 90
User-agent: Google-CloudVertexBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 31
Content-Signal: search=yes,ai-train=no,use=reference
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Arabic (ar)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 60 of 100.

It keeps 16 of 51 AI crawlers out, for training and for answers: the site’s choice, never scored.

60of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Structured data +12Sitemap +10

Can AI find it?

20/32

Can AI read it?

40/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Below the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, which is 72.

Checked 31 Oct 2026

What to fix

2 fixes, up to +22 points

  • Structured data

    Now None found.

    Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.

    Details

    Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://shamela.ws as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.
    +12points

  • Sitemap

    Now None found.

    Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add an XML sitemap at https://shamela.ws/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://shamela.ws/sitemap.xml" to https://shamela.ws/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
    +10points
Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://shamela.ws for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://shamela.ws/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://shamela.ws asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 90 linesFound
  • SitemapNone foundNot found
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts12,585 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    المكتبة الشاملة المكتبة الشاملة ساهم معنا الرئيسية الذكاء أقسام المكتبة المؤلفون تنزيل المكتبة حول المشروع اتصل بنا المكتبة الشاملة الموقع الرسمي لمشروع المكتبة الشاملة نحو ٧ ملايين صفحة و ٨ آلاف…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1
    <title>المكتبة الشاملة</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 1
    <meta name="description" content="الموقع الرسمي لمشروع المكتبة الشاملة.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataNone foundNot found

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Apple and 2 more kept out, Meta and ByteDance partlyPartly
  • AI answers and searchGoogle kept out; the rest let inPartly
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 56To answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsKept outClaudeBotline 47anthropic-ailine 62Claude-Webline 65To answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsKept outGoogle-Extendedline 53To answer people and searchKept outGoogle-CloudVertexBotline 90
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsPartlymeta-externalagentline 74, kept outFacebookBotlet inTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsKept outApplebot-Extendedline 38To answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 35To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsKept outCCBotline 44To answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsPartlyBytespiderline 41, kept outTikTokSpiderlet inTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

5 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai, Diffbot, Omgili, ICC-Crawler and Cotoyogi.

What it tells AI crawlers

  • Content Signalssearch=yes,ai-train=no,use=referenceFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 31
    Content-Signal: search=yes,ai-train=no,use=reference
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • A “noai” tagNoneNot found

Like 32% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

56 of 100: some trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

56of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · no privacy policy link · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5site name in another script than its address: couldn’t check · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 2006.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 21 of 21 years · see the first capture

  1. 2006: captured
  2. 2007: captured
  3. 2008: captured
  4. 2009: captured
  5. 2010: captured
  6. 2011: captured
  7. 2012: captured
  8. 2013: captured
  9. 2014: captured
  10. 2015: captured
  11. 2016: captured
  12. 2017: captured
  13. 2018: captured
  14. 2019: captured
  15. 2020: captured
  16. 2021: captured
  17. 2022: captured
  18. 2023: captured
  19. 2024: captured
  20. 2025: captured
  21. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

934 checks on 31 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#17,900list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#68,612list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CSS framework
Bootstrap

And 6 more around it (CDN, DNS, Analytics, SEO), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot found
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsPartly
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredCouldn’t check
  • First seen onlineNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesFound
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

56of 100

Some trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about shamela.ws

What is shamela.ws?

shamela.ws describes itself: “الموقع الرسمي لمشروع المكتبة الشاملة.” It looks like a software product or app. See the evidence

How old is shamela.ws?

The web archive first saw it on 8 Apr 2006, 20 years ago. See the evidence

What is shamela.ws built with?

It is built with Bootstrap; we found 7 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is shamela.ws?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was shamela.ws made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind shamela.ws?

Wikidata names Al-Maktaba Al-Shamela. See the evidence

More sites like this: software or app

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 31 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share shamela.ws

The result describes what we found on 31 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.