Rubika
rubika.ir
In its own wordsسوپر اپلیکیشن روبیکا
Rubika
In its own wordsسوپر اپلیکیشن روبیکا
Rubika (rubika.ir) is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 2018. It is built with Django and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #6,878 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #27,999
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #6,878 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #27,999 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with Django, jQuery and Swiper.
<input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken">
<script src="/static/js/jquery.js">
<script src="/static/js/swiper-bundle.min.js">
Around it: CDN, SEO.
cf-ray: a4c2dfe24efc47bf-BOM
rubika.ir TXT google-site-verification=y6eRQg7hrk-iOwkQDNzsO0w4tXZcOouenc3yTdBtq2I
2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
<a href="tel:99977">99977 (پاسخگویی 24 ساعته در تمامی روزهای هفته)</a>
<a href="tel:99977">99977 (پاسخگویی 24 ساعته در تمامی روزهای هفته)</a>
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “سوپر اپلیکیشن روبیکا”.
In its own wordsسوپر اپلیکیشن روبیکا
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
"name": "Rubika"
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
76 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Scored on the parts we could check.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
First archived in 2018.
In the web archive: captured in 9 of 9 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
927 checks on 17 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
The web archive first saw it on 19 Mar 2018, 8 years ago. See the evidence
It is built with Django and jQuery; we found 5 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Its structured data names Rubika. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 17 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.