Scan a site

Psychologies.com

psychologies.com

Scanned Fresh936 checks

82of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news sitePsychologies.com - Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.comPsychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withWordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery17 technologies foundTrust signals2 of 7 foundDomain registered 28 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

psychologies.com looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1998. It is built with WordPress, Bootstrap and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #17,076 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #16,851

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#17,076list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#16,851list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with WordPress, jQuery and jQuery Migrate and 2 more.

  • WordPressCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 15
    <link rel="preload" href="/wp-content/themes/psycho-v2/assets/fonts/Arimo/Arimo-Regular.woff2">
    Popular sites using WordPress Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 323
    <script src="https://www.psychologies.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQuery MigrateJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 324
    <script src="https://www.psychologies.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=3.4.1">
    Popular sites using jQuery Migrate Is this wrong? Report it
  • SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 334
    <script src="https://www.psychologies.com/wp-content/themes/psycho-v2/assets/dependencies/swiper/swiper.min.js?ver=6365">
    Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it
  • BootstrapCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 2553
    <script src="https://www.psychologies.com/wp-content/themes/reworldmedia/assets/javascripts/bootstrap/bootstrap.min.js?ver=6365">
    Popular sites using Bootstrap Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (12)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered2 Feb 1998, 28 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: PsychologiesPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: Prebid.jsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered2 Feb 1998, 28 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsPsychologies.com - Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.comPsychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q762287: Psychologies, magazine
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 292
<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.psychologies.com/feed">
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataPsychologies
  • WikidataPsychologies

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and Wikidata.

Wikidata: Owned by Rossel; based in France.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 288
"name": "Psychologies"
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q762287: Psychologies
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: names CCBot with rules for some pages.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: CCBot
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Psychologies.com
Language
French (fr-FR)
What it tells search engines
CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationPsychologies

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI and its agents: it scores 92 of 100.

It lets every AI crawler in: the site’s choice, never scored.

92of 100

AI readiness

Agent-ready

It offers AI agents a way to use it.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly
  4. Agent-ready

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

10/10
  • Files for AI agents

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 97% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 30 Oct 2026

What to fix

Optional: 3 fixes few sites have yetup to +8 points

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.psychologies.com/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.psychologies.com asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 67 linesFound
  • Sitemap2 listed in robots.txt, and the first lists 49 pagesFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 3
    Sitemap: https://www.psychologies.com/sitemap-news.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts24,090 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Psychologies.com - Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com Tests Trouver Un Psy S ’ abonner Fermer Rejoignez la communaut é Psychologies et recevez toutes nos actus…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 274
    <title>Psychologies.com - Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 275
    <meta name="description" content="Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: CollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, WebSite and 1 moreFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 288
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsFound, for www.psychologies.comFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource, line 1
    {"resource":"https:\/\/www.psychologies.com\/wp-json\/mcp\/mcp-oauth-server","authorization_servers":["https:\/\/www.psychologies.com"],"bearer_methods_supporte…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingCommon Crawl partly; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsLet inGPTBotTo answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsLet inClaudeBotanthropic-aiClaude-WebTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsLet inmeta-externalagentFacebookBotTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsLet inAmazonbotTo answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsPartlyCCBotline 59, some pathsTo answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsLet inBytespiderTikTokSpiderTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 68% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

82 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

82of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · no privacy policy link · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 28 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1998.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

936 checks on 30 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#17,076list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#16,851list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
WordPress
JavaScript library
jQuery, jQuery Migrate, Swiper
CSS framework
Bootstrap

And 12 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot found
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

82of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about psychologies.com

What is psychologies.com?

psychologies.com describes itself: “Psychologie, mieux se connaître pour mieux vivre sa vie | Psychologies.com” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is psychologies.com?

Its domain was registered on 2 Feb 1998, 28 years ago. See the evidence

What is psychologies.com built with?

It is built with WordPress, Bootstrap and jQuery; we found 17 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is psychologies.com?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was psychologies.com made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind psychologies.com?

Psychologies, named by its structured data and Wikidata. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 30 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share psychologies.com

The result describes what we found on 30 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.