paryajlakay
paryajlakay.com is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2019. It uses Cloudflare, Gandi DNS and Google Workspace; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before its JavaScript runs, so we also read its own scripts (/main.f424a88359834b38e4a7.js, /runtime.18618aa49b7df08eae83.js) for traces.
Popularity
Website Traffic CheckerAmong the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #10,319 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: Not ranked
Each list, with its date
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #10,319 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | Not ranked | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Technology
Tech Stack CheckerNo framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.
Everything else it uses (6)
Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.
CloudflareCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response headerPopular sites using Cloudflare Is this wrong? Report itcf-ray: a5016401aa576a2d-LAX
Gandi DNSDNSShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Gandi DNS Is this wrong? Report itparyajlakay.com NS ns-77-c.gandi.net.
Google WorkspaceEmailShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Google Workspace Is this wrong? Report itparyajlakay.com MX 1 smtp.GOOGLE.com.
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report itparyajlakay.com TXT google-site-verification=bYXvy-mzG5R0_okJeqU_CkaeQ2Sr5nVidoDwNoGTZVY
Google FontsFontsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 11Popular sites using Google Fonts Is this wrong? Report it<link rel="preload" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:400,500,700|Roboto+Condensed:400,400i,500,700,700i&display=swap">
Meta BusinessBusiness toolsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Meta Business Is this wrong? Report itparyajlakay.com TXT facebook-domain-verification=aa6omqa6avohd50vg3d5f2zimf20my
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
Trust signals
Website Trust Checker1 of 1 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
- Domain registered26 Jul 2019, 7 years agoNoted
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at
On the site
- Contact pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- About pageNamed in the app’s own codeFound
- Privacy policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- TermsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- Refund or returns policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- Contact detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- Company detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- Payment providersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
- TrackersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Behind the site
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter
- Domain registered26 Jul 2019, 7 years agoNoteddomain registry
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Protective settings6 of 6 in placeFound
- Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
What it is
Website SummaryThe page doesn’t say what it is.
The page has no title or description.
Why can this be empty?The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts
AI use
- AI training: asks anthropic-ai, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot and 9 more to stay away.
- AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, meta-externalfetcher and PerplexityBot to stay away.
Show evidence (16)Hide evidence
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
User-agent: Omgilibot · Disallow: /
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
User-agent: Meta-ExternalFetcher · Disallow: /
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
- Site name
- Not given
- Language
- Not given
- What it tells search engines
- None
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
Built with AI?
AI Website DetectorNo AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
How we know
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
Score breakdown
Site Score86 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Why each part scored what it did
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Domain history
Domain HistoryRegistered in 2019; first archived in 2020.
- Domain registeredRDAP
- First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
- First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
- This scanCheckAnySite
In the web archive: captured in 7 of 7 years · see the first capture
- 2020: captured
- 2021: captured
- 2022: captured
- 2023: captured
- 2024: captured
- 2025: captured
- 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
- Since our previous scan
- This is our first scan of the site.
How we scanned it
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
- Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
- With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
- Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers
924 checks on 25 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Questions about paryajlakay.com
How old is paryajlakay.com?
Its domain was registered on 26 Jul 2019, 7 years ago. See the evidence
What is paryajlakay.com built with?
It uses Cloudflare, Gandi DNS and Google Workspace; we found 6 technologies in all. See the evidence
How popular is paryajlakay.com?
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco and Chrome UX Report. See the evidence
Was paryajlakay.com made with AI?
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
More sites near it in popularity
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 25 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
What this scan can’t tell you
- Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
- Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
- How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
- Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.