Scan a site

parfumo.de is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 2009. It is built with PHP and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #20,677 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #352,407

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#20,677list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#352,407list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with jQuery and PHP.

  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 2457
    <script src="https://www.parfumo.de/js/plugins/jquery-3.7.1.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • PHPLanguageShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    set-cookie: PHPSESSID=…
    Popular sites using PHP Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (8)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: Google AnalyticsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry publishes no registration date, only when the record last changed (6 Mar 2019)Couldn’t checkWHOIS (whois.denic.de)
  • First seen online22 Jan 2009, 17 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Community mit allen Parfums, Duftbeschreibungen und Bewertungen | Parfumo”.

In its own wordsCommunity mit allen Parfums, Duftbeschreibungen und Bewertungen | ParfumoCommunity zu Parfums - großes Duft-Verzeichnis, Duftbeschreibungen, Bewertungen, Rezensionen, Duftnoten und vieles mehr.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • copyright lineParfumo
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 2449
© Parfumo
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts
Its summary for AI assistantsParfumo ist die Community für Parfum-Kenner und Duftliebhaber: ein großes Duft-Verzeichnis mit Duftbeschreibungen, Bewertungen, Rezensionen, Duftnoten und vielem mehr.Read it in full

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks Bytespider, Amazonbot, Timpibot, GPTBot and 2 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
  • Content signals: search=yes, ai-input=yes, ai-train=no.
Show evidence (7)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 16
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 21
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 23
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 30
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 32
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 2
Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-input=yes, ai-train=no
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
German (de)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 76 of 100.

It keeps 6 AI training crawlers out, and lets AI assistants in: the site’s choice, never scored.

76of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Structured data +12

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

46/58
  • Text without scripts
  • Title and description
  • Structured data
  • llms.txt
  • Markdown copy

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 55% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 3 Nov 2026

What to fix

1 fix, up to +12 points

  • Structured data

    Now None found.

    Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.

    Details

    Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://www.parfumo.de as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.
    +12points
Optional: 2 fixes few sites have yetup to +12 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.parfumo.de for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 41 linesFound
  • Sitemap2 listed in robots.txt, and the first lists 38 sitemapsFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 42
    Sitemap: https://www.parfumo.de/sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts7,312 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Community mit allen Parfums, Duftbeschreibungen und Bewertungen | Parfumo Login Login Konto erstellen Passwort vergessen? Login Home Parfum Alle Parfums Neu Top Trends Dupes Entdecken Erweiterte…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copySent when asked: 6,415 charactersFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · the page as Markdown, line 5
    ## Login
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • llms.txtFound: “Parfumo”Found
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · llms.txt, line 3
    > Parfumo ist die Community für Parfum-Kenner und Duftliebhaber: ein großes Duft-Verzeichnis mit Duftbeschreibungen, Bewertungen, Rezensionen, Duftnoten und vielem mehr.
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 185
    <title>Community mit allen Parfums, Duftbeschreibungen und Bewertungen | Parfumo</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 16
    <meta name="description" content="Community zu Parfums - großes Duft-Verzeichnis, Duftbeschreibungen, Bewertungen, Rezensionen, Duftnoten und vieles mehr.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataNone foundNot found

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI and Amazon kept out, Anthropic, Meta and ByteDance partly; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 30To answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsPartlyClaudeBotline 31, kept outanthropic-ailet inClaude-Weblet inTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsPartlymeta-externalagentline 32, kept outFacebookBotlet inTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 21To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsLet inCCBotTo answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsPartlyBytespiderline 16, kept outTikTokSpiderlet inTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

1 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out: Timpibot.

What it tells AI crawlers

  • Content Signalssearch=yes, ai-input=yes, ai-train=noFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 2
    Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-input=yes, ai-train=no
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • A “noai” tagNoneNot found

Like 27% of the 632 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 779 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 8% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 10% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

75 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

75of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 2009.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 18 of 18 years · see the first capture

  1. 2009: captured
  2. 2010: captured
  3. 2011: captured
  4. 2012: captured
  5. 2013: captured
  6. 2014: captured
  7. 2015: captured
  8. 2016: captured
  9. 2017: captured
  10. 2018: captured
  11. 2019: captured
  12. 2020: captured
  13. 2021: captured
  14. 2022: captured
  15. 2023: captured
  16. 2024: captured
  17. 2025: captured
  18. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

936 checks on 3 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#20,677list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#352,407list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
jQuery
Language
PHP

And 8 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredCouldn’t check
  • First seen onlineNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

75of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about parfumo.de

What is parfumo.de?

parfumo.de describes itself: “Community zu Parfums - großes Duft-Verzeichnis, Duftbeschreibungen, Bewertungen, Rezensionen, Duftnoten und vieles mehr.” See the evidence

How old is parfumo.de?

The web archive first saw it on 22 Jan 2009, 17 years ago. See the evidence

What is parfumo.de built with?

It is built with PHP and jQuery; we found 10 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is parfumo.de?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was parfumo.de made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind parfumo.de?

Its copyright line names Parfumo. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 3 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share parfumo.de

The result describes what we found on 3 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.