okdiario.com
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteOkdiario, el digital de Eduardo IndaÚltimas noticias de España, Economía, Deportes, Real Madrid, Corazón y toda la última hora. Sigue los eventos de hoy en directo.
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteOkdiario, el digital de Eduardo IndaÚltimas noticias de España, Economía, Deportes, Real Madrid, Corazón y toda la última hora. Sigue los eventos de hoy en directo.
okdiario.com looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2014. It is built with WordPress; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 1K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #1,407 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #8,537
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #1,407 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 1,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #8,537 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with WordPress.
<script src="https://okdiario.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js">
Around it: CDN, Performance, DNS, Email and more.
cf-ray: a4a613b88f9737c0-AMS
_mta-sts.okdiario.com CNAME d33t9tphz334bz.cloudfront.net.
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.w3-edge.com/products/ Minimizado usando disk Served from: okdiario.com @ 2026-10-14 12:59:49 by W3 Total Cache -->
okdiario.com NS duke.ns.cloudflare.com.
okdiario.com MX 10 aspmx.l.google.com.
okdiario.com TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.acumbamail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:zcsend.net ~all
_dmarc.okdiario.com TXT TXT v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:9828fe52091b468aad41373f7561d372@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
<img src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=20643943&cv=2.0&cj=1">
<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v13.4.1 - https://yoast.com/word…
<meta name="google-site-verification" content="Bsm1OIjp2UNNIjGdrqIuTdjeLT-rT8a6jhbPFkSK9W4">
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="9060941D7D7EF131828B7E43E1D51066">
<meta name="yandex-verification" content="8b3a8f5ddfaeb5f4">
<link rel="preload" href="https://okdiario.com/web/themes/v10/css/_fonts/font-awesome.4.5.0.css">
okdiario.com TXT apple-domain-verification=JHNWLJh9bDaEV8tH
okdiario.com TXT globalsign-domain-verification=mwDGIClUM7cgfVJ0HIyzz61BU0ct5XWdjCkIhG2GKu
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
Looks like: Blog or news site.
In its own wordsOkdiario, el digital de Eduardo IndaÚltimas noticias de España, Economía, Deportes, Real Madrid, Corazón y toda la última hora. Sigue los eventos de hoy en directo.
Our reading of the page, high confidence.
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization"
<link rel="alternate" href="https://okdiario.com/feed">
Okdiario, el digital de Eduardo Inda · okdiario.com · Últimas noticias de España, Economía, Deportes, Real Madrid, Corazón y toda la última hora. Sigue los even
Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and Wikidata.
Wikidata: Based in Madrid, Spain; founded by Eduardo Inda.
"name": "Okdiario"
Q30901816: Okdiario
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
88 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2014; first archived in 2015.
In the web archive: captured in 12 of 12 years · see the first capture
| Scanned | Score | AI traces | Popularity |
|---|---|---|---|
| shown above | 88 | None found | Top 1K |
| 88 | None found | Top 1K |
Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
928 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.