namasha
namasha.com
In its own wordsنماشا - سرویس رایگان اشتراک ویدیوویدیوهای خود را به سادگی و رایگان در نماشا آپلود کرده و با دیگران به اشتراک بگذارید.
namasha
In its own wordsنماشا - سرویس رایگان اشتراک ویدیوویدیوهای خود را به سادگی و رایگان در نماشا آپلود کرده و با دیگران به اشتراک بگذارید.
namasha (namasha.com) is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2014. It is built with Sign in with Google; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #7,717 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #46,648
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #7,717 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #46,648 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with Sign in with Google.
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/gsi/client">
Around it: CDN, Analytics, SEO, Video.
cf-ray: a4cfee017a697660-SEA
<script src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-D1KQ2TE7QD">
namasha.com TXT google-site-verification=Lnjcy1LN_OItldiEPebZTYs-NWW-A1s6dIs6Ve5usAk
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="2E09196069263352CF9B5B0DD75788E9">
…a.com/content/players/jw/player-8.11.10/jwplayer.js">
3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “نماشا - سرویس رایگان اشتراک ویدیو”.
In its own wordsنماشا - سرویس رایگان اشتراک ویدیوویدیوهای خود را به سادگی و رایگان در نماشا آپلود کرده و با دیگران به اشتراک بگذارید.
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
"name": "namasha"
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
88 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2014.
The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
928 checks on 19 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
namasha describes itself: “ویدیوهای خود را به سادگی و رایگان در نماشا آپلود کرده و با دیگران به اشتراک بگذارید.” See the evidence
Its domain was registered on 23 Aug 2014, 12 years ago. See the evidence
It is built with Sign in with Google; we found 6 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Its structured data names namasha. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 19 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.