momoshop.com.tw
In its own wordsmomo購物網
In its own wordsmomo購物網
momoshop.com.tw is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2004. It is built with Java; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before its JavaScript runs, so we also read its own script (/uw4wd7Hzb/3nnWgPfyS/7Qs/fjQ3eE/VcG7rfk5cOS9/I2pObA/CEFWE05a/FkwT?v=92549f76-de39-60c5-ee81-42615117174b) for traces.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #5,671 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #23,739
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #5,671 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #23,739 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with Java.
Around it: CDN, DNS, Analytics, SEO.
cf-ray: a4b2c0dddac15fa5-SIN
x-akamai-transformed: 0 - 0 -
momoshop.com.tw NS ns-1135.awsdns-13.org.
…)(window,document,'script','https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-22652017-1'…momoshop.com.tw TXT google-site-verification=Bf0ZzZNiToiF7nwHo5TpPLfoe-AzQ13GWPsGZlXCloc
We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “momo購物網”.
In its own wordsmomo購物網
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
83 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Scored on the parts we could check.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2004; first archived in 2005.
In the web archive: captured in 22 of 22 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
925 checks on 15 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Its domain was registered on 18 Oct 2004, 21 years ago. See the evidence
It is built with Java; we found 6 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 15 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.