Scan a site

MAWAQIT

mawaqit.net

Scanned Fresh935 checks

82of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteMAWAQIT – Mosque Prayer Times App, Free & Ad-FreeExact prayer times set by your mosque, notifications and mosque news on your phone, mosque screens and smartwatch. Free and ad-free, in over 160 countries.
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withSanity, Next.js, Tailwind CSS12 technologies foundTrust signals2 of 7 foundDomain registered 8 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

MAWAQIT (mawaqit.net) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2017. It is built with Sanity, Next.js and Tailwind CSS; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #19,763 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #212,302

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#19,763list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#212,302list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Sanity, Next.js and Tailwind CSS.

  • SanityCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 8
    …ta property="og:image" content="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/4cpxooa4/production/0066ff90ebdc…
    Popular sites using Sanity Is this wrong? Report it
  • Next.jsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 8
    <script src="/_next/static/chunks/2i51e627rllld.js">
    Popular sites using Next.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • Tailwind CSSCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1
    …der-spacing-x:0;--tw-border-spacing-y:0;--tw-translate-x:0;--tw-translate-y:0;--tw-translate-z…
    Popular sites using Tailwind CSS Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (9)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Marketing and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered15 Nov 2017, 8 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "c•••@mawaqit.net"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "c•••@mawaqit.net"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsName: MAWAQITPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered15 Nov 2017, 8 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsMAWAQIT – Mosque Prayer Times App, Free & Ad-FreeExact prayer times set by your mosque, notifications and mosque news on your phone, mosque screens and smartwatch. Free and ad-free, in over 160 countries.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · its own title or description
MAWAQIT – Mosque Prayer Times App, Free & Ad-Free · MAWAQIT · Exact prayer times set by your mosque, notifications and mosque news on your phone, mosque screens
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 8
<a href="https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/raspberry-pi-prayer-reminder-clock/">Raspberry Pi Blog (opens in a new tab)</a>
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 8
<a href="https://magazine.raspberrypi.com/articles/raspberry-pi-prayer-reminder-clock">The MagPi (opens in a new tab)</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataMAWAQIT
  • copyright lineMAWAQIT

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and copyright line.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8
"name": "MAWAQIT"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 8
© 2026 MAWAQIT
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai and Claude-Web to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 2
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 3
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 4
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
MAWAQIT
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
Organization, WebSite

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationMAWAQIT

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 72 of 100.

It keeps 3 AI training crawlers out, and lets AI assistants in: the site’s choice, never scored.

72of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Sitemap +10

Can AI find it?

20/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

At the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read.

Checked 2 Nov 2026

What to fix

1 fix, up to +10 points

  • Sitemap

    Now Listed in robots.txt, but it answers 404.

    Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.

    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 9
    Sitemap: https://mawaqit.net/sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add an XML sitemap at https://www.mawaqit.net/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://www.mawaqit.net/sitemap.xml" to https://www.mawaqit.net/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
    +10points
Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.mawaqit.net for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.mawaqit.net/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.mawaqit.net asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 8 linesFound
  • SitemapListed in robots.txt, but it answers 404Partly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 9
    Sitemap: https://mawaqit.net/sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts8,899 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    MAWAQIT – Mosque Prayer Times App, Free & Ad-Free News · On Instagram: @mawaqit Follow our news every day (opens in a new tab) Follow @mawaqit (opens in a new tab) Skip to content Shop (opens in a…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8
    <title>MAWAQIT – Mosque Prayer Times App, Free & Ad-Free</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 8
    <meta name="description" content="Exact prayer times set by your mosque, notifications and mosque news on your phone, mosque screens and smartwatch. Free and ad-free, in over 160 countries.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: Organization and WebSiteFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingAnthropic kept out; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsLet inGPTBotTo answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsKept outClaudeBotline 2anthropic-ailine 3Claude-Webline 4To answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsLet inmeta-externalagentFacebookBotTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsLet inAmazonbotTo answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsLet inCCBotTo answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsLet inBytespiderTikTokSpiderTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 29% of the 495 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 622 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 2% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

82 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

82of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page14 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page14 / 30no contact page link · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 8 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2017; first archived in 2018.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 9 of 9 years · see the first capture

  1. 2018: captured
  2. 2019: captured
  3. 2020: captured
  4. 2021: captured
  5. 2022: captured
  6. 2023: captured
  7. 2024: captured
  8. 2025: captured
  9. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

935 checks on 2 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#19,763list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#212,302list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
Sanity
Framework
Next.js
CSS framework
Tailwind CSS

And 9 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Marketing), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECFound
  • Certificate authoritiesFound
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

82of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page14 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about mawaqit.net

What is mawaqit.net?

MAWAQIT describes itself: “Exact prayer times set by your mosque, notifications and mosque news on your phone, mosque screens and smartwatch. Free and ad-free, in over 160 countries.” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is mawaqit.net?

Its domain was registered on 15 Nov 2017, 8 years ago. See the evidence

What is mawaqit.net built with?

It is built with Sanity, Next.js and Tailwind CSS; we found 12 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is mawaqit.net?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was mawaqit.net made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind mawaqit.net?

MAWAQIT, named by its structured data and its copyright line. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 2 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share mawaqit.net

The result describes what we found on 2 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.