Scan a site

litnet.com

Scanned Fresh927 checks

80OF 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsЧитать книги онлайн бесплатно полностью, скачать в fb2, epub, mobi — «Литнет»Самая крупная литературная платформа и библиотека, которая превращает чтение и публикацию книг в удовольствие. Более 180 000 книг, которые можно бесплатно читать онлайн и скачать. Все популярные жанры: любовный роман, фэнтези, фантастика и другие.
PopularityTop 1KBuilt withBootstrap, jQuery18 technologies foundTrust signals3 of 7 foundDomain registered 26 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

litnet.com is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2000. It is built with Bootstrap and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 1K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #1,293 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #92,486

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#1,293list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 1,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#92,486list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with jQuery, Slick and bxSlider and 1 more.

  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 94
    <script src="https://rust.litnet.com/assets/14d46b5e8f285850ad23067ffcf34218/jquery.min.js?h=b1af0547">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • SlickJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 8909
    <script src="https://rust.litnet.com/common/plugins/slick/slick.min.js?v=d5a61c749e44e47159af8a6579dda121">
    Popular sites using Slick Is this wrong? Report it
  • bxSliderJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 8913
    <script src="https://rust.litnet.com/common/plugins/bxslider/jquery.bxslider.min.js?h=a507fd45">
    Popular sites using bxSlider Is this wrong? Report it
  • BootstrapCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 96
    <script src="https://rust.litnet.com/assets/2a9caf7e8cd855906726676fdb90107a/js/bootstrap.min.js?h=9f659827">
    Popular sites using Bootstrap Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (14)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered6 Jun 2000, 26 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8829, as Cloudflare’s email protection decodes itMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:h•••@litnet.com">h•••@litnet.com</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8829, as Cloudflare’s email protection decodes itMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:h•••@litnet.com">h•••@litnet.com</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Cloudflare Web Analytics, Yandex MetricaNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter
  • Domain registered6 Jun 2000, 26 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Читать книги онлайн бесплатно полностью, скачать в fb2, epub, mobi — «Литнет»”.

In its own wordsЧитать книги онлайн бесплатно полностью, скачать в fb2, epub, mobi — «Литнет»Самая крупная литературная платформа и библиотека, которая превращает чтение и публикацию книг в удовольствие. Более 180 000 книг, которые можно бесплатно читать онлайн и скачать. Все популярные жанры: любовный роман, фэнтези, фантастика и другие.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • WikidataBooknet
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q62069735: Booknet
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Booknet · website, samizdat · since 2015

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks ClaudeBot to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Russian (ru-RU)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

80 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

80OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 26 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5site name in another script than its address: couldn’t check · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2000; first archived in 1997.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. First scanned by usCheckAnySite
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 20 of 30 years · see the first capture

  1. 1997: captured
  2. 1998: captured
  3. 1999: captured
  4. 2000: captured
  5. 2001: no capture
  6. 2002: no capture
  7. 2003: no capture
  8. 2004: no capture
  9. 2005: no capture
  10. 2006: no capture
  11. 2007: no capture
  12. 2008: no capture
  13. 2009: no capture
  14. 2010: captured
  15. 2011: captured
  16. 2012: no capture
  17. 2013: captured
  18. 2014: captured
  19. 2015: captured
  20. 2016: captured
  21. 2017: captured
  22. 2018: captured
  23. 2019: captured
  24. 2020: captured
  25. 2021: captured
  26. 2022: captured
  27. 2023: captured
  28. 2024: captured
  29. 2025: captured
  30. 2026: captured

No captures 2001–2009: the site may have been offline or parked then, or the archive didn’t visit.

The web archive saw this address on 6 Jul 1997, before its current registration on 6 Jun 2000. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
No changes since 10 Oct 2026.
ScannedScoreAI tracesPopularity
shown above80None foundTop 1K
80None foundTop 1K

Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

927 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 1KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#1,293list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 1,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#92,486list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
jQuery, Slick, bxSlider
CSS framework
Bootstrap

And 14 more around it (CDN, Security, DNS, Email), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsPartly
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

80OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 5
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share litnet.com

The result describes what we found on 14 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.