Scan a site

Leckerschmecker

leckerschmecker.me

Scanned Fresh937 checks

90of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteLeckerschmecker.me – einzigartige Rezepte für jeden Tag. - LeckerschmeckerLass dich – wie Millionen anderer Fans – von unseren Rezepten inspirieren und werde auch du zum Kochkünstler!
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withWordPress, WordPress VIP, WordPress.com17 technologies foundTrust signals3 of 7 foundDomain registered 10 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

Leckerschmecker (leckerschmecker.me) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2016. It is built with WordPress, WordPress VIP and WordPress.com; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #21,182 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #613,275

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#21,182list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#613,275list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with WordPress, Swiper and WordPress VIP and 1 more.

  • WordPressCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 14
    <link rel="preload" href="https://www.leckerschmecker.me/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2025/09/leckerschmecker-logo-main.png">
    Popular sites using WordPress Is this wrong? Report it
  • SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 492
    2 class names starting with swiper-wrapper
    Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it
  • WordPress VIPHostingShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-powered-by: WordPress VIP <https://wpvip.com>
    Popular sites using WordPress VIP Is this wrong? Report it
  • WordPress.comHostingShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-hacker: If you're reading this, you should visit https://join.a8c.com/viphacker and apply to join the fun, mention this header.
    Popular sites using WordPress.com Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (13)

Around it: CDN, Performance, Email, Analytics and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered15 Apr 2016, 10 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: FUNKE Digital GmbHPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Parse.ly, TaboolaNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered15 Apr 2016, 10 years agoNotedWHOIS (whois.nic.me)
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings5 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsLeckerschmecker.me – einzigartige Rezepte für jeden Tag. - LeckerschmeckerLass dich – wie Millionen anderer Fans – von unseren Rezepten inspirieren und werde auch du zum Kochkünstler!

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 47
<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.leckerschmecker.me/feed">
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 242
<a href="https://www.leckerschmecker.me/tag/heissluftfritteuse">HEISSLUFTFRITTEUSE</a>
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 345
<a href="https://www.leckerschmecker.me/newsletter?utm_source=home&utm_medium=cta&utm_campaign=newsletter">Newsletter</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataFUNKE Digital GmbH
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 33
"name": "FUNKE Digital GmbH"
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks AI2Bot, Ai2Bot-Dolma, Amazonbot, anthropic-ai and 26 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User, DuckAssistBot and 9 more to stay away.
Show evidence (43)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 15
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 16
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 19
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 24
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 30
User-agent: Brightbot 1.0 · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 32
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 33
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 36
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 37
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 42
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 43
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 44
User-agent: Cotoyogi · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 47
User-agent: DeepSeekBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 49
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 54
User-agent: Factset_spyderbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 69
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 70
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 71
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 83
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 84
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 87
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 98
User-agent: SBIntuitionsBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 106
User-agent: TikTokSpider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 107
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · robots.txt, line 108
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 29 · robots.txt, line 110
User-agent: Webzio-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 30 · robots.txt, line 115
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 31 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 32 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 33 · robots.txt, line 39
User-agent: Claude-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 34 · robots.txt, line 50
User-agent: DuckAssistBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 35 · robots.txt, line 58
User-agent: Google-CloudVertexBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 36 · robots.txt, line 66
User-agent: iaskspider/2.0 · Disallow: /
Exhibit 37 · robots.txt, line 76
User-agent: meta-webindexer · Disallow: /
Exhibit 38 · robots.txt, line 77
User-agent: MistralAI-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 39 · robots.txt, line 82
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 40 · robots.txt, line 90
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 41 · robots.txt, line 91
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 42 · robots.txt, line 113
User-agent: YandexAdditional · Disallow: /
Exhibit 43 · robots.txt, line 114
User-agent: YandexAdditionalBot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Leckerschmecker
Language
German (de)
What it tells search engines
WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationFUNKE Digital GmbH

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI: it scores 82 of 100.

It keeps 43 of 51 AI crawlers out, for training and for answers: the site’s choice, never scored.

82of 100

AI readiness

AI-friendly

It says what it is in structured data and lists its pages.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly

To reach Agent-ready:Files for AI agents +10

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 56% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 3 Nov 2026

What to fix

Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.leckerschmecker.me for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.leckerschmecker.me/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.leckerschmecker.me asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 116 linesFound
  • Sitemap2 listed in robots.txt, and the first lists 118 pagesFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 10
    Sitemap: https://www.leckerschmecker.me/news-sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts5,651 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Leckerschmecker.me – einzigartige Rezepte für jeden Tag. - Leckerschmecker Schließen Suche nach: Suche Rezepte HEISSLUFTFRITTEUSE FRÜHSTÜCK VEGETARISCH VEGAN BACKEN GETRÄNKE Schnelle Rezepte Magazin…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 14
    <title>Leckerschmecker.me – einzigartige Rezepte für jeden Tag. - Leckerschmecker</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 15
    <meta name="description" content="Lass dich – wie Millionen anderer Fans – von unseren Rezepten inspirieren und werde auch du zum Kochkünstler!">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList and 2 moreFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 33
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Apple and 3 more kept out; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and Mistral kept out, Meta partly; the rest let inPartly
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 33To answer people and searchKept outOAI-SearchBotline 82ChatGPT-Userline 35
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsKept outClaudeBotline 36anthropic-ailine 22Claude-Webline 37To answer people and searchKept outClaude-SearchBotline 38Claude-Userline 39
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsKept outGoogle-Extendedline 59To answer people and searchKept outGoogle-CloudVertexBotline 58
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchKept outPerplexityBotline 91Perplexity-Userline 90
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsLet inmeta-externalagentFacebookBotTo answer people and searchPartlymeta-externalfetcherlet inmeta-webindexerline 76, kept out
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsKept outApplebot-Extendedline 24To answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 19To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsKept outCCBotline 32To answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsKept outBytespiderline 31TikTokSpiderline 106To answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchKept outMistralAI-Userline 77

24 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai, cohere-training-data-crawler, Diffbot, Omgilibot, Omgili and 19 more.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 26% of the 706 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 868 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 8% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 10% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

90 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

90of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 10 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2016; first archived in 2016.

  1. Domain registeredWHOIS (whois.nic.me)
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 11 of 11 years · see the first capture

  1. 2016: captured
  2. 2017: captured
  3. 2018: captured
  4. 2019: captured
  5. 2020: captured
  6. 2021: captured
  7. 2022: captured
  8. 2023: captured
  9. 2024: captured
  10. 2025: captured
  11. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

937 checks on 3 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#21,182list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#613,275list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
WordPress
JavaScript library
Swiper
Hosting
WordPress VIP, WordPress.com

And 13 more around it (CDN, Performance, Email, Analytics), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

90of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about leckerschmecker.me

What is leckerschmecker.me?

Leckerschmecker describes itself: “Lass dich – wie Millionen anderer Fans – von unseren Rezepten inspirieren und werde auch du zum Kochkünstler!” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is leckerschmecker.me?

Its domain was registered on 15 Apr 2016, 10 years ago. See the evidence

What is leckerschmecker.me built with?

It is built with WordPress, WordPress VIP and WordPress.com; we found 17 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is leckerschmecker.me?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was leckerschmecker.me made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind leckerschmecker.me?

Its structured data names FUNKE Digital GmbH. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 3 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share leckerschmecker.me

The result describes what we found on 3 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.