Scan a site

Ilta-Sanomat (is.fi) is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2016. It is built with Next.js and Tailwind CSS; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #6,477 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #10,519

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#6,477list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#10,519list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Next.js and Tailwind CSS.

  • Next.jsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 9
    <script src="/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js">
    Popular sites using Next.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • Tailwind CSSCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1
    /*! tailwindcss v4.3.3 | MIT License | https://tailwindcs…
    Popular sites using Tailwind CSS Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (13)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered12 Sept 2016, 10 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsPhone on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 9Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=35••••••••19">Lähetä Whatsappissa</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsPhone on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 9Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=35••••••••19">Lähetä Whatsappissa</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered12 Sept 2016, 10 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings6 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Ilta-Sanomat - IS - Suomen suurin uutismedia”.

In its own wordsIlta-Sanomat - IS - Suomen suurin uutismediaLue uutisia Suomesta ja maailmalta heti tuoreeltaan. IS seuraa uutistilannetta ympäri vuorokauden.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • WikidataIlta-Sanomat

Wikidata: Owned by Sanoma Corporation; based in Helsinki, Finland.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q1001384: Ilta-Sanomat
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Ilta-Sanomat: Finnish tabloid newspaper · tabloid newspaper · since 1932

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks CCBot, GPTBot, Google-Extended, ImagesiftBot and 21 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot, Google-CloudVertexBot and 5 more to stay away.
Show evidence (34)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 18
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 19
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 20
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 21
User-Agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 23
User-agent: Omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 24
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 25
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 26
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 27
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 29
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 32
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 33
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 34
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 36
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 42
User-agent: Webzio-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 49
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 51
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 52
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 53
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 55
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 57
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 62
User-agent: DeepSeekBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 17
User-agent: ChatGPT-user · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 30
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 29 · robots.txt, line 37
User-agent: Google-CloudVertexBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 30 · robots.txt, line 39
User-agent: Meta-ExternalFetcher · Disallow: /
Exhibit 31 · robots.txt, line 58
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 32 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: Claude-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 33 · robots.txt, line 60
User-agent: MistralAI-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 34 · robots.txt, line 64
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Ilta-Sanomat
Language
Finnish (fi)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

89 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

89OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 10 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2016; first archived in 2013.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 11 of 14 years · see the first capture

  1. 2013: captured
  2. 2014: no capture
  3. 2015: no capture
  4. 2016: no capture
  5. 2017: captured
  6. 2018: captured
  7. 2019: captured
  8. 2020: captured
  9. 2021: captured
  10. 2022: captured
  11. 2023: captured
  12. 2024: captured
  13. 2025: captured
  14. 2026: captured

No captures 2014–2016: the site may have been offline or parked then, or the archive didn’t visit.

The web archive saw this address on 18 Jul 2013, before its current registration on 12 Sept 2016. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

926 checks on 17 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#6,477list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 5,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#10,519list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Framework
Next.js
CSS framework
Tailwind CSS

And 13 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsPartly
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

89OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about is.fi

What is is.fi?

Ilta-Sanomat describes itself: “Lue uutisia Suomesta ja maailmalta heti tuoreeltaan. IS seuraa uutistilannetta ympäri vuorokauden.” See the evidence

How old is is.fi?

Its domain was registered on 12 Sept 2016, 10 years ago. See the evidence

What is is.fi built with?

It is built with Next.js and Tailwind CSS; we found 15 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is is.fi?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was is.fi made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind is.fi?

Wikidata names Ilta-Sanomat. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 17 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share is.fi

The result describes what we found on 17 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.