Getty Images

gettyimages.in

Scanned 27 Oct 2026Fresh927 checks

In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteRoyalty-Free Stock Photos, Creative Images & Vectors | News, Fashion, and Entertainment imagery - Getty ImagesDiscover Getty Images' unrivalled collection of royalty-free images to find the perfect stock photo, vector or illustration that resonates with your customers.

Getty Images (gettyimages.in) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2005. It is built with AngularJS, Ruby on Rails and Swiper; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Top 1KTop 10KTop 100KTop 1MOutside top 1M

Tranco: #13,770 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #32,425

Each list, with its date

Source	Says	As of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.	#13,770	list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.	Top 10,000	Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0	#32,425	list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with AngularJS, Ruby on Rails and Swiper.

AngularJSFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 57
```
1 attributes starting with ng-app
```
Popular sites using AngularJS Is this wrong? Report it
Ruby on RailsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 56
```
<meta name="csrf-param" content="authenticity_token">
```
Popular sites using Ruby on Rails Is this wrong? Report it
SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 87
```
1 class names starting with swiper-wrapper
```
Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it

Everything else it uses (9)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.

CloudflareCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
cf-ray: a50e6d23b9e3c974-IAD
```
Popular sites using Cloudflare Is this wrong? Report it
Cloudflare Bot ManagementSecurityShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
set-cookie: __cf_bm=…
```
Popular sites using Cloudflare Bot Management Is this wrong? Report it
Amazon Route 53DNSShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
gettyimages.in NS ns-1269.awsdns-30.org.
```
Popular sites using Amazon Route 53 Is this wrong? Report it
MimecastEmailShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
gettyimages.in MX 10 us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com.
```
Popular sites using Mimecast Is this wrong? Report it

DMARC Analyzer (Mimecast)EmailShow evidenceHide evidence

Evidence · DNS record

_dmarc.gettyimages.in TXT v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:46b8708e09fb858@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com; ruf=mailto:46b8708e09fb858@for.dmarcanalyzer.com; fo=1;

Google Tag ManagerTag managerShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 124
```
<iframe height="0" src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-P4WB37" style="display: none; vi…
```
Popular sites using Google Tag Manager Is this wrong? Report it
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 57
```
<meta name="google-site-verification" content="EzTFgFTZSDjAQvukrk-ONWYWLO9iKq62KIgJvRvBxHs">
```
Popular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report it
Bing Webmaster ToolsSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 57
```
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="F521F521DC752C3BC8B83288705E4B2C">
```
Popular sites using Bing Webmaster Tools Is this wrong? Report it
Google FontsFontsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 56
```
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato:400,400i,700,700i&subset=latin-ext">
```
Popular sites using Google Fonts Is this wrong? Report it

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Domain registered24 Mar 2005, 21 years agoNoted
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 56Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
"telephone": "+18•••••••79"
Is this wrong? Report it
Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted

Every signal we looked at

On the site

Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
About pageLinked from the home pageFound
Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 56Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
"telephone": "+18•••••••79"
Is this wrong? Report it
Company detailsName: Getty ImagesPartly
Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
Domain registered24 Mar 2005, 21 years agoNoteddomain registry
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsRoyalty-Free Stock Photos, Creative Images & Vectors | News, Fashion, and Entertainment imagery - Getty ImagesDiscover Getty Images' unrivalled collection of royalty-free images to find the perfect stock photo, vector or illustration that resonates with your customers.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence

Exhibit 1 · its own title or description

Royalty-Free Stock Photos, Creative Images & Vectors | News, Fashion, and Entertainment imagery - Getty Images · Discover Getty Images' unrivalled collection of

Exhibit 2 · page source, line 67

<a href="https://unsplash.com/blog/advertise-on-unsplash/"></a>

Exhibit 3 · visible text

…View all View more News News Search the latest news photos & coverage of world events with…

Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

structured dataGetty Images
copyright lineGetty Images

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and copyright line.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence

Exhibit 1 · page source, line 56

"name": "Getty Images"

Exhibit 2 · page source, line 96

© 2026 Getty Images. The Getty Images design is a trademark of Getty Images.

Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Its pages are marked “noai”.

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · page source, line 57

<meta name="robots" content="noai, noimageai">

Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name: Getty Images
Language: English (en-gb)
What it tells search engines: Organization

Named in its structured data

OrganizationGetty Images

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

92 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10

Why each part scored what it did

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30no contact page link · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 21 years ago

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2005.

24 Mar 2005Domain registeredRDAP
22 Aug 2011First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
27 Oct 2026This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts

Since our previous scan: This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.

This scan, in numbers

927 checks on 27 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Questions about gettyimages.in

What is gettyimages.in?

Getty Images describes itself: “Discover Getty Images' unrivalled collection of royalty-free images to find the perfect stock photo, vector or illustration that resonates with your customers.” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is gettyimages.in?

Its domain was registered on 24 Mar 2005, 21 years ago. See the evidence

What is gettyimages.in built with?

It is built with AngularJS, Ruby on Rails and Swiper; we found 12 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is gettyimages.in?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was gettyimages.in made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind gettyimages.in?

Getty Images, named by its structured data and its copyright line. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 27 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you

Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.