Scan a site

Femina

femina.hu

Scanned Fresh937 checks

90of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteFemina — FeminaSzéleskörű női témák: sztárhírek, egészséges életmód, szépségápolás, pszichológia, gyereknevelés, receptek, kvízek
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withTailwind CSS, Caddy, Alpine.js14 technologies foundTrust signals3 of 7 foundDomain registered 26 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

Femina (femina.hu) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2000. It is built with Tailwind CSS, Caddy and Alpine.js; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #20,911 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #94,460

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#20,911list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#94,460list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Alpine.js, Tailwind CSS and Caddy.

  • Alpine.jsJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 803
    14 attributes starting with x-data
    Popular sites using Alpine.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • Tailwind CSSCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · stylesheet /neon/static/CACHE/a973b76b4988d2da/css/output.146dea8feb17.css
    …der-spacing-x:0;--tw-border-spacing-y:0;--tw-translate-x:0;--tw-translate-y:0;--tw-rotate:0;--…
    Popular sites using Tailwind CSS Is this wrong? Report it
  • CaddyWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    via: 1.1 Caddy
    Popular sites using Caddy Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (11)

Around it: CDN, Email, Analytics, Advertising and more.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered11 Oct 2000, 26 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8606Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:u•••@feminamedia.hu">Ügyelet</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsEmail on the home pagePartly
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8606Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:u•••@feminamedia.hu">Ügyelet</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers5 analytics and advertising tools: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, Facebook SDK, Google Ad Manager, AdOceanNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered11 Oct 2000, 26 years agoNotedWHOIS (whois.nic.hu)
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsFemina — FeminaSzéleskörű női témák: sztárhírek, egészséges életmód, szépségápolás, pszichológia, gyereknevelés, receptek, kvízek

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q108512779: Femina.hu, online newspaper
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • copyright lineIndaWorld Publishing Kft
  • WikidataFemina.hu

Wikidata: Based in Hungary.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8753
Copyright © 2007-2026 IndaWorld Publishing Kft. Minden jog fenntartva.
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q108512779: Femina.hu
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Femina.hu: Hungarian online magazine · online newspaper · since 2006

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks GPTBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot, Claude-Web and 22 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks MistralAI-User to stay away.
  • Its pages are marked “noai”.
Show evidence (28)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 74
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 80
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 84
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 87
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 90
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 94
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 98
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 102
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 105
User-agent: TikTokSpider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 109
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 113
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 116
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 120
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 123
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 127
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 130
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 133
User-agent: Omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 136
User-agent: Omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 139
User-agent: Webzio-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 142
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 145
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 148
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 151
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 155
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 158
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 166
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 162
User-agent: MistralAI-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · page source, line 120
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow, archive, imageindex, noodp, noydir, noai, noimageai, snippet, translate, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1">
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Femina
Language
Hungarian (hu)
What it tells search engines
WebSite, BreadcrumbList

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

Ready for AI: it scores 82 of 100.

It keeps 27 of 51 AI crawlers out, for training and for answers: the site’s choice, never scored.

82of 100

AI readiness

AI-friendly

It says what it is in structured data and lists its pages.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. AI-friendly

To reach Agent-ready:Files for AI agents +10

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

52/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 56% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 3 Nov 2026

What to fix

Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://femina.hu for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://femina.hu/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://femina.hu asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 165 linesFound
  • SitemapListed in robots.txt, and it lists 230 sitemapsFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 205
    Sitemap: https://femina.hu/sitemap-index.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts8,833 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Femina — Femina Index Economx Dívány Sóbors Totalcar Port.hu We ❤︎ Budapest Velvet Podcast Keresés Podcast Utazás Recept Hazai sztár Világsztár Életmód Gyerek Lélek & Test Szépség Otthon Terasz…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 44
    <title>Femina — Femina</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 49
    <meta name="description" content="Széleskörű női témák: sztárhírek, egészséges életmód, szépségápolás, pszichológia, gyereknevelés, receptek, kvízek">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: WebSite and BreadcrumbListFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 9035
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreKept out
  • AI answers and searchMistral kept out, OpenAI, Anthropic and 2 more partly; the rest let inPartly
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 74To answer people and searchPartlyOAI-SearchBotline 37, some pathsChatGPT-Userline 36, some paths
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsKept outClaudeBotline 84anthropic-ailine 90Claude-Webline 87To answer people and searchPartlyClaude-SearchBotline 39, some pathsClaude-Userline 38, some paths
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsKept outGoogle-Extendedline 80To answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchPartlyPerplexityBotline 41, some pathsPerplexity-Userline 40, some paths
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsKept outmeta-externalagentline 113FacebookBotline 116To answer people and searchPartlymeta-externalfetcherline 42, some pathsmeta-webindexerlet in
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsKept outApplebot-Extendedline 94To answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 109To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsKept outCCBotline 98To answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsKept outBytespiderline 102TikTokSpiderline 105To answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchKept outMistralAI-Userline 162

14 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai, cohere-training-data-crawler, Diffbot, Omgilibot, Omgili and 9 more.

What it tells AI crawlers

  • Content SignalsNoneNot found
  • A “noai” tagFoundFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 120
    <meta name="robots" content="index, follow, archive, imageindex, noodp, noydir, noai, noimageai, snippet, translate, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Like 26% of the 685 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 842 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 8% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

90 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

90of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 26 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2000; first archived in 2006.

  1. Domain registeredWHOIS (whois.nic.hu)
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 21 of 21 years · see the first capture

  1. 2006: captured
  2. 2007: captured
  3. 2008: captured
  4. 2009: captured
  5. 2010: captured
  6. 2011: captured
  7. 2012: captured
  8. 2013: captured
  9. 2014: captured
  10. 2015: captured
  11. 2016: captured
  12. 2017: captured
  13. 2018: captured
  14. 2019: captured
  15. 2020: captured
  16. 2021: captured
  17. 2022: captured
  18. 2023: captured
  19. 2024: captured
  20. 2025: captured
  21. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

937 checks on 3 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#20,911list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#94,460list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
Alpine.js
CSS framework
Tailwind CSS
Web server
Caddy

And 11 more around it (CDN, Email, Analytics, Advertising), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsPartly
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

90of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about femina.hu

What is femina.hu?

Femina describes itself: “Széleskörű női témák: sztárhírek, egészséges életmód, szépségápolás, pszichológia, gyereknevelés, receptek, kvízek” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is femina.hu?

Its domain was registered on 11 Oct 2000, 26 years ago. See the evidence

What is femina.hu built with?

It is built with Tailwind CSS, Caddy and Alpine.js; we found 14 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is femina.hu?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was femina.hu made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind femina.hu?

Its copyright line names IndaWorld Publishing Kft. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 3 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share femina.hu

The result describes what we found on 3 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.