Emojipedia (emojipedia.org) is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2013. It is built with Next.js, Tailwind CSS and Envoy; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #4,192 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #2,207

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#4,192list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#2,207list of 8 Oct 2026

Built with Next.js, Lucide and Tailwind CSS and 2 more.

  • Next.jsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1
    <script src="/_next/static/chunks/d2e50317-b534c2fd60ce5d6c.js">
    Popular sites using Next.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • LucideJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1
    2 class names starting with lucide
    Popular sites using Lucide Is this wrong? Report it
  • Tailwind CSSCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · stylesheet /_next/static/css/ae59842c0c627f6a.css
    …der-spacing-x:0;--tw-border-spacing-y:0;--tw-translate-x:0;--tw-translate-y:0;--tw-rotate:0;--…
    Popular sites using Tailwind CSS Is this wrong? Report it
  • EnvoyWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-envoy-upstream-service-time: 85
    Popular sites using Envoy Is this wrong? Report it
  • Google CloudHostingShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    via: 1.1 google
    Popular sites using Google Cloud Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (7)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics and more.

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered14 Jul 2013, 13 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsOrganization without name or addressNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Google Analytics, HotjarNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered14 Jul 2013, 13 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “📙 Emojipedia — 😃 Home of Emoji Meanings 💁👌🎍😍”.

In its own words📙 Emojipedia — 😃 Home of Emoji Meanings 💁👌🎍😍

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • WikidataEmojipedia

Wikidata: Owned by Zedge, Inc.

Its X, Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon and 1 more accounts are the ones Wikidata lists.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q22908129: Emojipedia
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Emojipedia: online emoji encyclopedia · website, online encyclopedia · since 2013

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot and 3 more to stay away.
  • AI training: names Google-Extended with rules for some pages.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
  • Content signals: search=yes,ai-train=no.
Show evidence (9)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 12
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 15
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 18
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 21
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 24
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 30
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 33
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 5
User-agent: Google-Extended
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 2
Content-Signal: search=yes,ai-train=no
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Emojipedia
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
Organization

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

92 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

92OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines8 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 13 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines8 / 10site name matches the domain · no description · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2013.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

929 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.