Scan a site

Yle.fi

yle.fi

Scanned Fresh927 checks

92OF 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteYle.fi | Uutiset, urheilu, ilmiötPysy helposti ajan tasalla, opi uutta ja syvennä ymmärrystäsi. Osallistu yhteisiin elämyksiin muiden suomalaisten kanssa. Kirjaudu ja tee Ylen palvelusta omasi.
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withstyled-components, Swiper14 technologies foundTrust signals3 of 7 foundDomain registered 35 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

yle.fi looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1990. It is built with styled-components and Swiper; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #3,694 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #2,163

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#3,694list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#2,163list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Swiper and styled-components.

  • SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 850
    1 class names starting with swiper-wrapper
    Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it
  • styled-componentsCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 242
    2 attributes starting with data-styled
    Popular sites using styled-components Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (12)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered31 Dec 1990, 35 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 119Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "telephone": "+35• • •••01"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 119Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "telephone": "+35• • •••01"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsName: YlePartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered31 Dec 1990, 35 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsYle.fi | Uutiset, urheilu, ilmiötPysy helposti ajan tasalla, opi uutta ja syvennä ymmärrystäsi. Osallistu yhteisiin elämyksiin muiden suomalaisten kanssa. Kirjaudu ja tee Ylen palvelusta omasi.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Also has signs of: Software or app.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · structured data
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 850
<a href="https://yle.fi/news">News</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataYle
  • WikidataYle

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and Wikidata.

Wikidata: Based in Länsi-Pasila, Finland.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 119
"name": "Yle"
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q54718: Yle
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Yle: Finland's national public-broadcasting company · public broadcaster, television station, radio station · since 1926

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks AI2Bot, Ai2Bot-Dolma, Amazonbot, anthropic-ai and 20 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User and iaskspider to stay away.
Show evidence (26)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 20
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 23
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 26
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 29
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 32
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 41
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 44
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 47
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 50
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: DeepSeekBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 62
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 65
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 71
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 74
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 86
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 89
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 95
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 98
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 101
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 104
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 116
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 122
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 131
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 83
User-agent: iaskspider/2.0 · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Yle.fi
Language
Finnish (fi)
What it tells search engines
WebSite, NewsMediaOrganization, SoftwareApplication

Named in its structured data

  • News Media OrganizationYle
  • AppYleNews

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

92 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

92OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 35 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1990; first archived in 1996.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 31 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: captured
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: captured
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

927 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#3,694list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 5,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#2,163list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
Swiper
CSS framework
styled-components

And 12 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, SEO), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

92OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share yle.fi

The result describes what we found on 14 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.