Scan a site

dot-st.com

Scanned Fresh937 checks

87of 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsand ST (アンドエスティ) | 公式ファッション通販グローバルワーク、ニコアンドなど 50ブランド以上の公式ファッション通販サイト。（旧：ドットエスティ） お店でもWEBでもポイントが貯まる、使える。
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withVue, jQuery15 technologies foundTrust signals4 of 7 foundDomain registered 12 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

dot-st.com is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2014. It is built with Vue and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #17,973 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #47,968

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#17,973list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#47,968list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Vue, jQuery and Swiper.

  • VueFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 128
    <script src="https://static.dot-st.com/static/mallDefault/common/js/lib/lm20261031195208/vue.min.js">
    Popular sites using Vue Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 122
    <script src="https://static.dot-st.com/static/mallDefault/common/js/lib/lm20261031195208/jquery.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • SwiperJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 133
    <script src="https://static.dot-st.com/static/mallDefault/common/js/lib/lm20261031195208/swiper-bundle.min.js">
    Popular sites using Swiper Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (12)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Tag manager and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered22 Apr 2014, 12 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Refund or returns policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered22 Apr 2014, 12 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “and ST (アンドエスティ) | 公式ファッション通販”.

In its own wordsand ST (アンドエスティ) | 公式ファッション通販グローバルワーク、ニコアンドなど 50ブランド以上の公式ファッション通販サイト。（旧：ドットエスティ） お店でもWEBでもポイントが貯まる、使える。

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Japanese (ja)
What it tells search engines
WebSite

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 75 of 100.

It lets every AI crawler in: the site’s choice, never scored.

75of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Sitemap +10

Can AI find it?

20/32

Can AI read it?

52/54
  • Text without scripts
  • Title and description
  • Structured data
  • llms.txt
  • Markdown copy

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 54% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 31 Oct 2026

What to fix

1 fix, up to +10 points

  • Sitemap

    Now None found.

    Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add an XML sitemap at https://www.dot-st.com/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://www.dot-st.com/sitemap.xml" to https://www.dot-st.com/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
    +10points
Optional: 3 fixes few sites have yetup to +14 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.dot-st.com for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.dot-st.com asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional

Left out of the score, as we couldn’t check it: llms.txt.

Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 4 linesFound
  • SitemapNone foundNot found
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts11,643 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    and ST (アンドエスティ) | 公式ファッション通販 メニュー and ST 探す 0 カート BRAND 閉じる アカウント 新規会員登録はこちら 新規会員登録で500円クーポンプレゼント 「お店で受取」なら送料無料 7日以内なら返品OK（SALE品も可） ログイン お気に入り 最近見たアイテム ランキング 店舗検索 LOWRYS FARM GLOBAL WORK LEPSIM niko…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtIt didn’t answerCouldn’t check
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 8
    <title>and ST (アンドエスティ) | 公式ファッション通販</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 11
    <meta name="description" content="グローバルワーク、ニコアンドなど 50ブランド以上の公式ファッション通販サイト。（旧：ドットエスティ）
お店でもWEBでもポイントが貯まる、使える。">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: WebSiteFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 21
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogIt didn’t answer in timeCouldn’t check
  • MCP serverIt didn’t answer in timeCouldn’t check
  • Agent cardIt didn’t answer in timeCouldn’t check
  • Agent SkillsIt didn’t answer in timeCouldn’t check
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreLet in
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

Its robots.txt names none of the 24 crawlers of the 10 AI companies we know, so it lets every one in.

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

If this is your site

  • Decide what AI may do with the site, and say it in robots.txt. Write the lines

Like 68% of the 1,691 popular sites whose robots.txt we read in October 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

87 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

87of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 5
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 12 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 5site name in another script than its address: couldn’t check · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2014; first archived in 2014.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 13 of 13 years · see the first capture

  1. 2014: captured
  2. 2015: captured
  3. 2016: captured
  4. 2017: captured
  5. 2018: captured
  6. 2019: captured
  7. 2020: captured
  8. 2021: captured
  9. 2022: captured
  10. 2023: captured
  11. 2024: captured
  12. 2025: captured
  13. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

937 checks on 31 Oct 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#17,973list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#47,968list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Framework
Vue
JavaScript library
jQuery, Swiper

And 12 more around it (CDN, Security, DNS, Tag manager), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyFound
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

87of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 5
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about dot-st.com

What is dot-st.com?

dot-st.com describes itself: “グローバルワーク、ニコアンドなど 50ブランド以上の公式ファッション通販サイト。（旧：ドットエスティ） お店でもWEBでもポイントが貯まる、使える。” See the evidence

How old is dot-st.com?

Its domain was registered on 22 Apr 2014, 12 years ago. See the evidence

What is dot-st.com built with?

It is built with Vue and jQuery; we found 15 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is dot-st.com?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was dot-st.com made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 31 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share dot-st.com

The result describes what we found on 31 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.