Scan a site

Dagbladet

dagbladet.no

Scanned Fresh925 checks

63OF 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsNyheter i dag: Dagbladet med dagens nyheter 24 timer i døgnetNyhetsnettsted med 1.2 millioner daglige lesere. Oppdateres døgnet rundt med nyheter fra inn- og utland, kultur, sport og underholdning.
PopularityTop 1KBuilt withjsDelivr, Cloudflare, Amazon CloudFrontAround the site; no CMS or framework visibleTrust signals3 of 7 foundDomain registered 3 months agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

Dagbladet (dagbladet.no) is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2026. It uses jsDelivr, Cloudflare and Amazon CloudFront; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 1K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #1,406 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #7,366

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#1,406list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 1,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#7,366list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.

Everything else it uses (16)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered6 Jul 2026, 3 months agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsEmail and phone on the home pageFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 4087Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:"></a>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 4087Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:+47••••••00">24 •• •• 00</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsEmail and phone on the home pageFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 4087Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:"></a>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 4087Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:+47••••••00">24 •• •• 00</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsName: DagbladetPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Google Ad Manager, Prebid.jsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered6 Jul 2026, 3 months agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Nyheter i dag: Dagbladet med dagens nyheter 24 timer i døgnet”.

In its own wordsNyheter i dag: Dagbladet med dagens nyheter 24 timer i døgnetNyhetsnettsted med 1.2 millioner daglige lesere. Oppdateres døgnet rundt med nyheter fra inn- og utland, kultur, sport og underholdning.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • structured dataDagbladet
  • copyright lineDagbladet

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and copyright line.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 336
"name": "Dagbladet"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 4087
© 2026 Dagbladet | Powered by Labrador CMS
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

AI use

  • AI training: asks Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot and 21 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks Claude-User, Claude-SearchBot, Google-CloudVertexBot, meta-externalfetcher and 9 more to stay away.
  • Content signals: search=yes, ai-train=no, ai-input=no.
Show evidence (39)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 34
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 37
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 40
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 46
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 52
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 55
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 58
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 67
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 70
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 73
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 76
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 82
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 91
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 94
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 97
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 100
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 103
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 106
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 109
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 112
User-agent: Webzio-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 115
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 118
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 121
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 127
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 43
User-agent: Claude-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 49
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · robots.txt, line 61
User-agent: Google-CloudVertexBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 29 · robots.txt, line 79
User-agent: Meta-ExternalFetcher · Disallow: /
Exhibit 30 · robots.txt, line 85
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 31 · robots.txt, line 88
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 32 · robots.txt, line 139
User-agent: iaskspider/2.0 · Disallow: /
Exhibit 33 · robots.txt, line 148
User-agent: DuckAssistBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 34 · robots.txt, line 154
User-agent: MistralAI-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 35 · robots.txt, line 157
User-agent: Amzn-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 36 · robots.txt, line 160
User-agent: Amzn-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 37 · robots.txt, line 163
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 38 · robots.txt, line 166
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 39 · robots.txt, line 28
Content-signal: search=yes, ai-train=no, ai-input=no
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Dagbladet
Language
Norwegian Bokmål (nb-no)
What it tells search engines
WebPage, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationDagbladet

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

63 of 100: some trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

63OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed4 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30no contact page link · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed4 / 25domain registered 3 months ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2026; first archived in 1996.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. First scanned by usCheckAnySite
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 31 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: captured
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: captured
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured

The web archive saw this address on 2 Nov 1996, before its current registration on 6 Jul 2026. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
No changes since 10 Oct 2026.
ScannedScoreAI tracesPopularity
shown above63None foundTop 1K
63None foundTop 1K

Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

925 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 1KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#1,406list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 1,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#7,366list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CDN
jsDelivr, Cloudflare, Amazon CloudFront
Security
Cloudflare Bot Management
DNS
Cloudflare DNS
Email
Microsoft 365
Advertising
Google Ad Manager, Prebid.js
Marketing
Mailchimp
SEO
Google Search Console
Cookie consent
Sourcepoint
Business tools
Meta Business, Pinterest Business, Atlassian, Miro, Dropbox
Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECFound
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

63OF 100

Some trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed4 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share dagbladet.no

The result describes what we found on 14 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.