crossthegame.com
In its own wordsCossthegame
In its own wordsCossthegame
crossthegame.com is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2024. It uses Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before its JavaScript runs, so we also read its own scripts (/dist/www/js/lazyload.min.js, /dist/www/js/cookieconsent.min.js) for traces.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #7,125 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: Not ranked
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #7,125 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | Not ranked | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, DNS, Tag manager, Advertising.
Around it: CDN, DNS, Tag manager, Advertising.
cf-ray: a4c5a3aafe8e4707-BOM
crossthegame.com NS kimora.ns.cloudflare.com.
…async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f…
<script async="" src="https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js">
4 of 4 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “Cossthegame”.
In its own wordsCossthegame
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
76 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2024; first archived in 2018.
In the web archive: captured in 3 of 9 years · see the first capture
No captures 2019–2023: the site may have been offline or parked then, or the archive didn’t visit.
The web archive saw this address on 6 Aug 2018, before its current registration on 5 Sept 2024. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
929 checks on 18 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Its domain was registered on 5 Sept 2024, 2 years ago. See the evidence
It uses Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager; we found 4 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco and Chrome UX Report. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 18 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.