Scan a site

CdM (cdm.me) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2008. It is built with WordPress and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #19,882 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #79,606

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#19,882list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#79,606list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with WordPress, jQuery and jQuery Migrate and 1 more.

  • WordPressCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 22
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://www.cdm.me/wp-content/cache/autoptimize/css/autoptimize_aed331afc6ce6ea23ccc75838f69728c.css">
    Popular sites using WordPress Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 99
    <script src="https://www.cdm.me/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQuery MigrateJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 100
    <script src="https://www.cdm.me/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Migrate Is this wrong? Report it
  • lazysizesJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 5437
    <script src="https://www.cdm.me/wp-content/plugins/autoptimize/classes/external/js/lazysizes.min.js?ao_version=3.1.17">
    Popular sites using lazysizes Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (15)

Around it: CDN, Performance, DNS, Email and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered9 Jul 2008, 18 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 41Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "r•••@cdm.me"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsIn structured dataFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 41Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    "email": "r•••@cdm.me"
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsName: CdM doo, address givenFound
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers2 analytics and advertising tools: Google Analytics, AdOceanNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered9 Jul 2008, 18 years agoNotedWHOIS (whois.nic.me)
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings2 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsCdM - Cafe del MontenegroUvijek provjerene informacije, sa vama od 1997. godine.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Also has signs of: Personal site or portfolio.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · structured data
"@type": "Article"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 50
<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.cdm.me/feed/">
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 263
<a href="https://www.cdm.me/news/">Vijesti</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataCdM doo
  • copyright lineCafe del Montenegro
Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 41
"name": "CdM doo"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 5412
© Cafe del Montenegro - All rights reserved
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: doesn’t ask AI training crawlers to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
CdM
Language
English (en-US)
What it tells search engines
Place, Organization, WebSite, WebPage, Person, Article

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationCdM dooPodgorica, Montenegro
  • PersonCdM Admin

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 74 of 100.

It lets every AI crawler in: the site’s choice, never scored.

74of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Sitemap +10

Can AI find it?

20/32

Can AI read it?

54/58
  • Text without scripts
  • Title and description
  • Structured data
  • llms.txt
  • Markdown copy

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Higher than 52% of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, whose median is 72.

Checked 2 Nov 2026

What to fix

1 fix, up to +10 points

  • Sitemap

    Now None found.

    Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add an XML sitemap at https://www.cdm.me/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://www.cdm.me/sitemap.xml" to https://www.cdm.me/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
    +10points
Optional: 3 fixes few sites have yetup to +16 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.cdm.me for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.cdm.me/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 9 linesFound
  • SitemapNone foundNot found
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts14,073 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts runMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    CdM - Cafe del Montenegro UMRLI.ME FORUM Cafe del Montenegro 02/••/••26 Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Naslovna Vijesti Politika Društvo Ekonomija Kultura Live 24 Hronika Sport Fudbal Košarka…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copySent when asked: 17,349 charactersFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · the page as Markdown, line 62
    ## [Građane pritiska inflacija, rastu turizam, zaposlenost i budžetski prihodi](https://www.cdm.me/ekonomija/gradane-pritiska-inflacija-rastu-turizam-zaposlenost-i-budzetski-prihodi/)
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 22
    <title>CdM - Cafe del Montenegro</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 23
    <meta name="description" content="Uvijek provjerene informacije, sa vama od 1997. godine.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataFound: Place, Organization, WebSite and 3 moreFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 41
    <script type="application/ld+json">
    Is this wrong? Report it

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 4 moreLet in
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

Its robots.txt names none of the 24 crawlers of the 10 AI companies we know, so it lets every one in.

None of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

If this is your site

  • Decide what AI may do with the site, and say it in robots.txt. Write the lines

Like 71% of the 520 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps no AI training crawler out. Of the 650 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 2% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

84 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

84of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30contact page linked · email and phone given · no privacy policy link · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 18 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2008; first archived in 2008.

  1. Domain registeredWHOIS (whois.nic.me)
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

935 checks on 2 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#19,882list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#79,606list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
WordPress
JavaScript library
jQuery, jQuery Migrate, lazysizes

And 15 more around it (CDN, Performance, DNS, Email), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot found
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsFound
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesFound
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

84of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page16 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about cdm.me

What is cdm.me?

CdM describes itself: “Uvijek provjerene informacije, sa vama od 1997. godine.” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is cdm.me?

Its domain was registered on 9 Jul 2008, 18 years ago. See the evidence

What is cdm.me built with?

It is built with WordPress and jQuery; we found 19 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is cdm.me?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was cdm.me made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind cdm.me?

Its structured data names CdM doo. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 2 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share cdm.me

The result describes what we found on 2 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.