Scan a site

callescort.org is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2014. It is built with PHP and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #22,067 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: Not ranked

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#22,067list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0Not rankedlist of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with jQuery, jQuery UI and FitVids and 2 more.

  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1353
    <script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQuery UIJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1357
    <script src="https://code.jquery.com/ui/1.12.1/jquery-ui.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery UI Is this wrong? Report it
  • FitVidsJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1366
    <script src="/js/fitvids.min.js">
    Popular sites using FitVids Is this wrong? Report it
  • MasonryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 1373
    <script src="/js/masonry.js">
    Popular sites using Masonry Is this wrong? Report it
  • PHPLanguageShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    set-cookie: PHPSESSID=…
    Popular sites using PHP Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (8)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics and more.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

1 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered28 Dec 2014, 11 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: Google AnalyticsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered28 Dec 2014, 11 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settingsNone in placeNot found
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Escorts in Las Vegas, escort phone numbers, photos, ratings”.

In its own wordsEscorts in Las Vegas, escort phone numbers, photos, ratingsEscorts in Las Vegas escorts, phone nubmers, reviews, pictures and videos

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

AI use

  • AI training: asks Amazonbot, Bytespider, Brightbot and GPTBot to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidence (4)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 41
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 44
User-agent: Brightbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 47
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 60 of 100.

It keeps 4 AI training crawlers out, and lets AI assistants in: the site’s choice, never scored.

60of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Structured data +12Sitemap +10

Can AI find it?

20/32

Can AI read it?

40/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Below the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, which is 72.

Checked 4 Nov 2026

What to fix

2 fixes, up to +22 points

  • Structured data

    Now None found.

    Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.

    Details

    Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://callescort.org as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.
    +12points

  • Sitemap

    Now None found.

    Publish an XML sitemap and list it in robots.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A sitemap lists every page, so crawlers find the ones no link leads to.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add an XML sitemap at https://callescort.org/sitemap.xml that lists the site’s public pages, in the sitemaps.org format, and add the line "Sitemap: https://callescort.org/sitemap.xml" to https://callescort.org/robots.txt. Generate it from the site’s routes, so new pages are added to it.
    +10points
Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://callescort.org for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://callescort.org/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://callescort.org asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 42 linesFound
  • SitemapNone foundNot found
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts5,198 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts run
    Escorts in Las Vegas, escort phone numbers, photos, ratings Menu Local escorts Petite Blonde Black BBW MILF Near me Post AD Post review Login Register Meet&Fuck Fuck now Local Sex Member Login E-mail…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 4
    <title>Escorts in Las Vegas, escort phone numbers, photos, ratings</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 6
    <meta name="description" content="Escorts in Las Vegas escorts, phone nubmers, reviews, pictures and videos">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataNone foundNot found

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI and Amazon kept out, ByteDance partly; the rest let inPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Perplexity and 3 moreLet in
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 47To answer people and searchLet inOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsLet inClaudeBotanthropic-aiClaude-WebTo answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsLet inGoogle-ExtendedTo answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inPerplexityBotPerplexity-User
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsLet inmeta-externalagentFacebookBotTo answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsLet inApplebot-ExtendedTo answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 22To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsLet inCCBotTo answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsPartlyBytespiderline 41, kept outTikTokSpiderlet inTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

1 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know is kept out: Brightbot.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 26% of the 846 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 1,038 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 3% send a Markdown copy, 10% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

70 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

70of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · no privacy policy link · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 11 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10site name differs from the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2014; first archived in 2015.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 12 of 12 years · see the first capture

  1. 2015: captured
  2. 2016: captured
  3. 2017: captured
  4. 2018: captured
  5. 2019: captured
  6. 2020: captured
  7. 2021: captured
  8. 2022: captured
  9. 2023: captured
  10. 2024: captured
  11. 2025: captured
  12. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

935 checks on 4 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#22,067list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic MillionNot rankedlist of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

JavaScript library
jQuery, jQuery UI, FitVids, Masonry
Language
PHP

And 8 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Analytics), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot found
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersNot found
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateNoted
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

70of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page12 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines2 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about callescort.org

What is callescort.org?

callescort.org describes itself: “Escorts in Las Vegas escorts, phone nubmers, reviews, pictures and videos” See the evidence

How old is callescort.org?

Its domain was registered on 28 Dec 2014, 11 years ago. See the evidence

What is callescort.org built with?

It is built with PHP and jQuery; we found 13 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is callescort.org?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco and Chrome UX Report. See the evidence

Was callescort.org made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 4 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share callescort.org

The result describes what we found on 4 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.