Scan a site

Good Food (bbcgoodfood.com) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2000. It is built with Next.js, React and Varnish; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #6,456 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #2,678

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#6,456list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#2,678list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Next.js, React and Varnish.

  • Next.jsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 394
    <script src="/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js">
    Popular sites using Next.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • ReactFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 105
    10 attributes starting with data-react-helmet
    Popular sites using React Is this wrong? Report it
  • VarnishWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    via: 1.1 varnish, 1.1 varnish
    Popular sites using Varnish Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (14)

Around it: CDN, Security, Email, Tag manager and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered15 Feb 2000, 26 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: Good FoodPartly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered15 Feb 2000, 26 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsGood Food | Recipes and cooking tips | Good FoodWe’re all about good recipes, and about quality home cooking that everyone can enjoy.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q28803244: BBC Good Food, magazine
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 1
<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/feed">
Exhibit 3 · page source, line 406
<a href="https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/newsletters">Newsletters</a>
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataGood Food
  • copyright lineImmediate
  • WikidataBBC Good Food

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and Wikidata.

Wikidata: Based in United Kingdom.

Its X account is the one Wikidata lists.

Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 406
"name": "Good Food"
Exhibit 2 · page source, line 406
© Immediate 2026
Exhibit 3 · Wikidata
Q28803244: BBC Good Food
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks AI2Bot, Ai2Bot-Dolma, Bytespider, CCBot and 2 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
  • Content signals: search=yes, ai-train=no.
Show evidence (7)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 60
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 63
User-agent: AI2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 66
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 72
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 75
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 78
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 50
Content-signal: search=yes, ai-train=no
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Good Food
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
WebPage, Organization

Named in its structured data

  • OrganizationGood Food

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

91 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

91OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 26 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 10site name differs from the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2000; first archived in 2001.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 26 of 26 years · see the first capture

  1. 2001: captured
  2. 2002: captured
  3. 2003: captured
  4. 2004: captured
  5. 2005: captured
  6. 2006: captured
  7. 2007: captured
  8. 2008: captured
  9. 2009: captured
  10. 2010: captured
  11. 2011: captured
  12. 2012: captured
  13. 2013: captured
  14. 2014: captured
  15. 2015: captured
  16. 2016: captured
  17. 2017: captured
  18. 2018: captured
  19. 2019: captured
  20. 2020: captured
  21. 2021: captured
  22. 2022: captured
  23. 2023: captured
  24. 2024: captured
  25. 2025: captured
  26. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

928 checks on 17 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#6,456list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#2,678list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Framework
Next.js, React
Web server
Varnish

And 14 more around it (CDN, Security, Email, Tag manager), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

91OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines5 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about bbcgoodfood.com

What is bbcgoodfood.com?

Good Food describes itself: “We’re all about good recipes, and about quality home cooking that everyone can enjoy.” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence

How old is bbcgoodfood.com?

Its domain was registered on 15 Feb 2000, 26 years ago. See the evidence

What is bbcgoodfood.com built with?

It is built with Next.js, React and Varnish; we found 17 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is bbcgoodfood.com?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was bbcgoodfood.com made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind bbcgoodfood.com?

Good Food, named by its structured data and Wikidata. See the evidence

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 17 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share bbcgoodfood.com

The result describes what we found on 17 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.