archiveofourown.org is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2007. It is built with Ruby on Rails and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Among the top 1K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #1,098 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #8,026

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#1,098list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 1,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#8,026list of 8 Oct 2026

Built with Ruby on Rails, jQuery and jQuery UI.

  • Ruby on RailsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 36
    <meta name="csrf-param" content="authenticity_token">
    Popular sites using Ruby on Rails Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQueryJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 346
    <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.0/jquery.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery Is this wrong? Report it
  • jQuery UIJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 347
    <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.10.0/jquery-ui.min.js">
    Popular sites using jQuery UI Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (5)

Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, SEO.

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered30 May 2007, 19 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS, but plain HTTP doesn’t send visitors therePartly
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsLinked from the home pageFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter
  • Domain registered30 May 2007, 19 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS, but plain HTTP doesn’t send visitors therePartly
  • Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Home | Archive of Our Own”.

In its own wordsHome | Archive of Our OwnAn Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • WikidataArchive of Our Own

Wikidata: Owned by Organization for Transformative Works.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q27764876: Archive of Our Own
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Archive of Our Own: nonprofit online fanfiction repository operated by the Organization for Transformative Works · service on Internet, fiction repository · since 2008

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Find them on

The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.

AI use

  • AI training: asks CCBot and GPTBot to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User to stay away.
Show evidence (3)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 30
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 33
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 36
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

80 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

80OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections10 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 19 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections10 / 15loads over HTTPS · doesn’t send visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2007; first archived in 2008.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
  4. First scanned by usCheckAnySite
  5. This scanCheckAnySite
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
No changes since 10 Oct 2026.
ScannedScoreAI tracesPopularity
shown above80None foundTop 1K
80None foundTop 1K

Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

927 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.