Scan a site

adressa.no is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2023. It is built with Nuxt, Vue and Varnish; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #19,113 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #33,133

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#19,113list of 27 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Sep 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#33,133list of 28 Oct 2026
Was this answer right?

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Nuxt, Vue and Varnish.

  • NuxtFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 17
    <script src="/_nuxt/pox.vendors/app.06e95311ff297856e550.js">
    Popular sites using Nuxt Is this wrong? Report it
  • VueFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 10
    1 attributes starting with data-server-rendered
    Popular sites using Vue Is this wrong? Report it
  • VarnishWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-varnish: 395555546 395668205
    Popular sites using Varnish Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (7)

Around it: CDN, Email, SEO, Fonts and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Was this answer right?

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered22 Jun 2023, 3 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsEmail and phone on the home pageFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 14Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:t•••@adresseavisen.no">t•••@adresseavisen.no</a>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 13Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:46••••00">46 •• •• 00</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home pageFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsEmail and phone on the home pageFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 14Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="mailto:t•••@adresseavisen.no">t•••@adresseavisen.no</a>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 13Masked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    <a href="tel:46••••00">46 •• •• 00</a>
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered22 Jun 2023, 3 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings1 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

Was this answer right?

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Adressa - adressa.no”.

In its own wordsAdressa - adressa.noHold deg oppdatert med Midt-Norges og Trondheims største regionavis. Vi gir deg alltid de siste nyhetene innen innenriks, utenriks, sport og kultur.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • copyright lineAdresseavisen
  • WikidataAdresseavisen

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: copyright line and Wikidata.

Wikidata: Owned by Polaris Media Midt-Norge; based in Trondheim, Norway.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 17
. Adresseavisen har ikke ansvar for innhold på eksterne nettsider som det lenkes til. Alt innhold er opphavsrettslig beskyttet 2026 © Adresseavisen
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q367105: Adresseavisen
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Adresseavisen: Norwegian newspaper · regional newspaper · since 1767

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks Bytespider, CCBot, FacebookBot, Google-Extended and 12 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User and 1 more to stay away.
Show evidence (21)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 18
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 19
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 20
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 21
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 24
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 25
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 26
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 27
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 28
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: claude-web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 34
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 36
User-agent: diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 39
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 23
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 29
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 32
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 33
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 37
User-agent: DuckAssistBot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
adressa.no
Language
Norwegian Bokmål (nb)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Was this answer right?

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

We look for what AI site builders such as Lovable, Bolt and v0 leave in a page. Code written with an AI assistant such as Cursor, Claude Code or ChatGPT leaves nothing to find, so we can’t tell whether AI helped.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,275 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Was this answer right?

AI access

AI Crawler Checker

AI can find it and read it: it scores 70 of 100.

It keeps 21 of 51 AI crawlers out, for training and for answers: the site’s choice, never scored.

70of 100

AI readiness

Readable

Its words are in the HTML, with a title and a description.

  1. Findable
  2. Readable
  3. 4Agent-ready

To reach AI-friendly:Structured data +12

Can AI find it?

30/32

Can AI read it?

40/58

Can agents use it?

0/10

Optional: for sites with an API or a sign-in.

Below the median of the 2,439 most visited sites we read, which is 72.

Checked 1 Nov 2026

What to fix

1 fix, up to +12 points

  • Structured data

    Now None found.

    Add schema.org structured data, as JSON-LD, to the home page’s HTML.

    Details

    Why it matters: Structured data tells AI tools and search engines what the site is: a company, a shop, a product.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Add schema.org structured data to the home page of https://www.adressa.no as JSON-LD, in a <script type="application/ld+json"> tag in its HTML: an Organization with its name, url, logo and sameAs links to its official profiles, and a WebSite with its name and url. Add the type that fits what the site offers too, such as Product, Article or LocalBusiness. Use only facts that are true of the site.
    +12points
Optional: 4 fixes few sites have yetup to +18 points

  • Files for AI agents

    Now None of the 8 we look for.

    If agents could use the site, publish what they need where they look.

    Details

    Why it matters: Agents act for people: they look for these files to know what a site lets them do. Worth it only if agents can use the site.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    If AI agents could use https://www.adressa.no for its visitors (to search it, book, buy or sign in), publish what they need at the standard addresses, and only what the site really offers: an MCP server card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json if it runs an MCP server, an API catalog at /.well-known/api-catalog (RFC 9727) listing its public APIs, and OAuth protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource (RFC 9728) if agents sign in.
    +10optional

  • llms.txt

    Now None found.

    Publish a short Markdown summary of the site at /llms.txt.

    Details

    Why it matters: A short summary for AI models, at an address they can find. A proposal: few AI companies say they read it yet.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    Create https://www.adressa.no/llms.txt as llmstxt.org describes it: a Markdown file with an H1 naming the site, a one-paragraph summary in a blockquote, and short sections listing its most useful pages as links, each with a line on what it holds. Serve it as text/plain or text/markdown.
    +4optional

  • Markdown copy

    Now Not offered: it sends the page’s HTML.

    Answer requests for Markdown with a Markdown version of the page.

    Details

    Why it matters: A Markdown copy gives AI tools the page’s words without the HTML around them.

    Prompt for your coding assistant (Claude Code, Cursor, your builder’s chat)
    When a request to https://www.adressa.no asks for Markdown (its Accept header includes text/markdown), answer with a Markdown version of the page’s main content and the header Content-Type: text/markdown. Requests for HTML keep getting HTML; add Vary: Accept so caches keep the two apart.
    +2optional
Every check, with its evidence

Can AI find it?

  • robots.txtFound, 42 linesFound
  • Sitemap2 listed in robots.txt, and the first lists 337 sitemapsFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 46
    Sitemap: https://www.adressa.no/sitemaps/adresseavisen-root-sitemap.xml
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Links for AI toolsNone in the home page’s headersNot found
  • Search listingAllowed: no noindex ruleAllowed

Can AI read it?

  • Text without scripts1,406 characters before scripts runFound
    Show evidenceHide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page text, before scripts runMasked for privacy. An email address or phone number can belong to a person, and data protection law, such as the EU’s GDPR, asks us to keep only what we need: that the page lists one, and where.
    Adressa - adressa.no adressa Nyheter Sport Kultur Debatt Nytte Play 0 Tips oss! Tips oss! Hver måned belønner vi det beste tipset med inntil 10.000 kroner. Alle tips blir vurdert. Ring 46 •• •• 00…
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Markdown copyNot offered: it sends the page’s HTMLNot found
  • llms.txtNone foundNot found
  • Title and descriptionBothFound
    Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
    Exhibit 1 · page source, line 4
    <title>Adressa - adressa.no</title>
    Exhibit 2 · page source, line 4
    <meta name="description" content="Hold deg oppdatert med Midt-Norges og Trondheims største regionavis. Vi gir deg alltid de siste nyhetene innen innenriks, utenriks, sport og kultur.">
    Is this wrong? Report it
  • Structured dataNone foundNot found

Can agents use it?

  • API catalogNone foundNot found
  • Sign-in for AI agentsNone foundNot found
  • Auth.mdNone foundNot found
  • AI catalogNone foundNot found
  • MCP serverNone foundNot found
  • Agent cardNone foundNot found
  • Agent SkillsNone foundNot found
  • Agents in DNSNone foundNot found

What it lets AI do

Not scored

Keeping AI out is the site’s choice, so it never lowers the score.

  • AI trainingOpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta and 3 more kept out, ByteDance partlyPartly
  • AI answers and searchOpenAI and Perplexity kept out; the rest let inPartly
Every AI crawler, and how we checked

AI companies

  • OpenAIChatGPTTo train its modelsKept outGPTBotline 22To answer people and searchKept outOAI-SearchBotline 29ChatGPT-Userline 23
  • AnthropicClaudeTo train its modelsKept outClaudeBotline 26anthropic-ailine 25Claude-Webline 31To answer people and searchLet inClaude-SearchBotClaude-User
  • GoogleGeminiTo train its modelsKept outGoogle-Extendedline 21To answer people and searchLet inGoogle-CloudVertexBot
  • PerplexityTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchKept outPerplexityBotline 32Perplexity-Userline 33
  • MetaMeta AITo train its modelsKept outmeta-externalagentline 35FacebookBotline 20To answer people and searchLet inmeta-externalfetchermeta-webindexer
  • AppleApple IntelligenceTo train its modelsKept outApplebot-Extendedline 34To answer people and searchNone named
  • AmazonTo train its modelsKept outAmazonbotline 28To answer people and searchLet inAmzn-SearchBotAmzn-User
  • Common Crawlopen data for trainingTo train its modelsKept outCCBotline 19To answer people and searchNone named
  • ByteDanceTo train its modelsPartlyBytespiderline 18, kept outTikTokSpiderlet inTo answer people and searchNone named
  • MistralLe ChatTo train its modelsNone namedTo answer people and searchLet inMistralAI-User

6 of the 27 other AI crawlers we know are kept out: cohere-ai, Diffbot, Omgili, AI2Bot, YouBot and 1 more.

What it tells AI crawlers

It gives no Content Signals and no “noai” tag.

Like 29% of the 417 popular sites whose robots.txt we’ve read since 29 Oct 2026, it keeps at least one AI training crawler out. Of the 529 popular sites we’ve checked since 29 Oct 2026, 9% have a page drawn by scripts, 2% send a Markdown copy, 9% have an llms.txt and 3% offer a file for AI agents. How many websites block AI crawlers?

We read the site once, as our named bot: its robots.txt, read as crawlers read it, its home page and the files AI tools ask sites for. What we couldn’t read says so. robots.txt asks and doesn’t enforce: a firewall can treat AI crawlers differently from us.

Was this answer right?

Score breakdown

Site Score

80 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

80of 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed20 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30contact page linked · email and phone given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed20 / 25domain registered 3 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · doesn’t insist on HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Was this answer right?

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2023; first archived in 1998.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. Domain registeredRDAP
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 29 of 29 years · see the first capture

  1. 1998: captured
  2. 1999: captured
  3. 2000: captured
  4. 2001: captured
  5. 2002: captured
  6. 2003: captured
  7. 2004: captured
  8. 2005: captured
  9. 2006: captured
  10. 2007: captured
  11. 2008: captured
  12. 2009: captured
  13. 2010: captured
  14. 2011: captured
  15. 2012: captured
  16. 2013: captured
  17. 2014: captured
  18. 2015: captured
  19. 2016: captured
  20. 2017: captured
  21. 2018: captured
  22. 2019: captured
  23. 2020: captured
  24. 2021: captured
  25. 2022: captured
  26. 2023: captured
  27. 2024: captured
  28. 2025: captured
  29. 2026: captured

The web archive saw this address on 12 Dec 1998, before its current registration on 22 Jun 2023. It was probably registered again, possibly by a new owner.

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.
Was this answer right?

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

935 checks on 1 Nov 2026, with version 0.6.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#19,113list of 27 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Sep 2026
  • Majestic Million#33,133list of 28 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Framework
Nuxt, Vue
Web server
Varnish

And 7 more around it (CDN, Email, SEO, Fonts), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsFound
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

80of 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page22 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed20 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections11 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

Questions about adressa.no

What is adressa.no?

adressa.no describes itself: “Hold deg oppdatert med Midt-Norges og Trondheims største regionavis. Vi gir deg alltid de siste nyhetene innen innenriks, utenriks, sport og kultur.” See the evidence

How old is adressa.no?

Its domain was registered on 22 Jun 2023, 3 years ago. See the evidence

What is adressa.no built with?

It is built with Nuxt, Vue and Varnish; we found 10 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is adressa.no?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was adressa.no made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind adressa.no?

Adresseavisen, named by its copyright line and Wikidata. See the evidence

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 1 Nov 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share adressa.no

The result describes what we found on 1 Nov 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Trywikipedia.orgstripe.combbc.co.uk

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.