XDA
xda-developers.com
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteXDAThe world’s best source for computing news, reviews, editorials guides, and more.
XDA
In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteXDAThe world’s best source for computing news, reviews, editorials guides, and more.
XDA (xda-developers.com) looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2002. It is built with WordPress; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #4,689 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #1,626
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #4,689 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 10,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #1,626 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with WordPress.
<link rel="preload" href="https://static0.xdaimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/wm/2026/10/antigravity-saves-twice-time-compared-to-vs-code.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=432&h=288&dpr=2">
Around it: CDN, Security, Email, Analytics and more.
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hls.js@latest">
cf-ray: a4a9d516dfa3a9c8-TPE
…2-captcha-container\" class=\"g-recaptcha-container\" hidden><\/div>…
xda-developers.com MX 10 aspmx.l.google.com.
xda-developers.com TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.emailcampaigns.net ~all
<script src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-CW1BQM4JMY">
xda-developers.com TXT google-site-verification=5dEWe2VJ92QC0FCSXyEg-yneBNjDjfM92SW0io0UWwg
xda-developers.com TXT facebook-domain-verification=zqdfjg0fx03qad0495u1r9ebixksm1
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
u•••@website.com Complete Your Registration
u•••@website.com Complete Your Registration
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
Looks like: Blog or news site.
In its own wordsXDAThe world’s best source for computing news, reviews, editorials guides, and more.
Our reading of the page, medium confidence.
XDA · XDA · The world’s best source for computing news, reviews, editorials guides, and more.
<a href="/news/">News</a>
<a href="/category/pc-hardware/">PC Hardware</a>
<a href="https://www.xda-developers.com/tag/android-auto/">Android Auto</a>
"name": "XDA"
© 2026 Valnet Inc.
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
The profiles its home page links. We haven’t checked who runs them.
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
User-agent: Applebot-extended · Disallow: /
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
91 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2002.
The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
927 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
XDA describes itself: “The world’s best source for computing news, reviews, editorials guides, and more.” It looks like a blog or news site. See the evidence
Its domain was registered on 12 Dec 2002, 23 years ago. See the evidence
It is built with WordPress; we found 9 technologies in all. See the evidence
It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence
We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence
Its structured data names XDA. See the evidence
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.