weather.gov
In its own wordsLooks like: Government or public bodyNational Weather Service
In its own wordsLooks like: Government or public bodyNational Weather Service
weather.gov looks like a government or public body site, is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 1999. It is built with jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 1K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #2,305 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #941
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #2,305 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 10,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #941 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with jQuery, jQuery Migrate and jQuery UI.
<script src="/js/jquery-1.12.4.min.js">
<script src="/js/jquery-migrate-1.4.1.js">
<script src="/js/jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js">
Around it: CDN, DNS, Analytics.
cf-ray: a49ab079b9410087-KIX
www.weather.gov CNAME sancert.weather.gov.edgekey.net.
weather.gov NS a1-97.akam.net.
<script src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-736JJ6NL0V">
3 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
Looks like: Government or public body.
In its own wordsNational Weather Service
Our reading of the page, high confidence.
Q1066823: National Weather Service, United States federal agency
https://www.weather.gov/
Wikidata: Part of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; based in Silver Spring, United States.
Its X and Facebook accounts are the ones Wikidata lists.
Q1066823: National Weather Service
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
87 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 1999; first archived in 1999.
In the web archive: captured in 28 of 28 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
928 checks on 13 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 13 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.