Telegram
telegram.org
In its own wordsTelegram MessengerFast. Secure. Powerful.
telegram
Telegram (telegram.org) is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2003. It is built with Bootstrap and nginx; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Popularity
Website Traffic CheckerAmong the top 1K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Top 1KTop 10KTop 100KTop 1MOutside top 1M
Tranco: #220 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #281
Each list, with its date
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #220 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 1,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #281 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Technology
Tech Stack CheckerBuilt with Bootstrap and nginx.
BootstrapCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 23Popular sites using Bootstrap Is this wrong? Report it<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/bootstrap.min.css?3">
nginxWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
Everything else it uses (3)
Around it: DNS, SEO, Business tools.
Google Cloud DNSDNSShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Google Cloud DNS Is this wrong? Report ittelegram.org NS ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com.
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report ittelegram.org TXT google-site-verification=R-3XYX47JUVHva3pnhnyjx5D72PtSnjtLMLj_tymTAc
YahooBusiness toolsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Yahoo Is this wrong? Report ittelegram.org TXT yahoo-verification-key=NRNCv6/IcZMkSv28KI97E4zgZVMkk4PejCwNSh8So2k=
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
Trust signals
Website Trust Checker2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
- Domain registered15 Dec 2003, 22 years agoNoted
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
- Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
- TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at
On the site
- Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
- About pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
- Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
- TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
- Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
- Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
- Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
- Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
- TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted
Behind the site
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
- Domain registered15 Dec 2003, 22 years agoNoteddomain registry
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Protective settings2 of 6 in placePartly
- Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
What it is
Website SummaryIt calls itself “Telegram Messenger”.
In its own wordsTelegram MessengerFast. Secure. Powerful.
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts
- Site name
- Telegram
- Language
- Not given
- What it tells search engines
- None
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
Built with AI?
AI Website DetectorNo AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
How we know
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
Score breakdown
Site Score81 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
TransparencyContact, policies and about page14 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page14 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 22 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Domain history
Domain HistoryRegistered in 2003; first archived in 2003.
- First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
- Domain registeredRDAP
- First certificate issuedCertificate Transparency
- First scanned by usCheckAnySite
- This scanCheckAnySite
In the web archive: captured in 17 of 24 years · see the first capture
- 2003: captured
- 2004: captured
- 2005: captured
- 2006: no capture
- 2007: no capture
- 2008: no capture
- 2009: no capture
- 2010: no capture
- 2011: no capture
- 2012: no capture
- 2013: captured
- 2014: captured
- 2015: captured
- 2016: captured
- 2017: captured
- 2018: captured
- 2019: captured
- 2020: captured
- 2021: captured
- 2022: captured
- 2023: captured
- 2024: captured
- 2025: captured
- 2026: captured
No captures 2006–2012: the site may have been offline or parked then, or the archive didn’t visit.
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
- Since our previous scan
- No changes since 10 Oct 2026.
| Scanned | Score | AI traces | Popularity |
|---|---|---|---|
| shown above | 81 | None found | Top 1K |
| 81 | None found | Top 1K |
Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.
How we scanned it
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
- Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
- With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
- Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers
927 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
More sites near it in popularity
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
What this scan can’t tell you
- Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
- Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
- How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
- Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.