ndr.de

Scanned Fresh927 checks

In its own wordsLooks like: Blog or news siteNDR.de - Das Beste am Norden - Radio - Fernsehen - Nachrichten | ndr.deAlles zum NDR Programm in Fernsehen und Radio. Regionale Nachrichten aus Norddeutschland, Sport, Ratgeber-Themen, Unterhaltung, Kultur und Geschichte.

ndr.de looks like a blog or news site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 1996. It is built with Varnish; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #3,518 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #1,693

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#3,518list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#1,693list of 8 Oct 2026

Built with Varnish.

  • VarnishWeb serverShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-varnish: 4986880
    Popular sites using Varnish Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (9)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, SEO and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

2 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page, and the page opensFound
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry publishes no registration date, only when the record last changed (11 Sept 2026)Couldn’t checkWHOIS (whois.denic.de)
  • First seen online12 Nov 1996, 29 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Blog or news site.

In its own wordsNDR.de - Das Beste am Norden - Radio - Fernsehen - Nachrichten | ndr.deAlles zum NDR Programm in Fernsehen und Radio. Regionale Nachrichten aus Norddeutschland, Sport, Ratgeber-Themen, Unterhaltung, Kultur und Geschichte.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 113
<link rel="alternate" href="https://www.ndr.de/index~atom.xml">
Exhibit 2 · its own title or description
NDR.de - Das Beste am Norden - Radio - Fernsehen - Nachrichten | ndr.de · ndr.de · Alles zum NDR Programm in Fernsehen und Radio. Regionale Nachrichten aus Nord
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • copyright lineNorddeutscher Rundfunk
  • WikidataNorddeutscher Rundfunk

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: copyright line and Wikidata.

Wikidata: Based in Hamburg, Germany.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 5648
© Norddeutscher Rundfunk
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q201275: Norddeutscher Rundfunk
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Norddeutscher Rundfunk: public service broadcaster in Northern Germany · German public state broadcaster, broadcaster, news media · since 1954
  • NDR.de: website · website

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of these items. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, ClaudeBot and 11 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidence (15)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 15
User-agent: applebot-extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 19
User-agent: bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 23
User-agent: ccbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 27
User-agent: claudebot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: google-extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 39
User-agent: deepseekbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 49
User-agent: diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 53
User-agent: facebookbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 56
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 60
User-agent: gptbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 68
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 79
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 82
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 86
User-agent: pangubot · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
ndr.de
Language
German (de)
What it tells search engines
collectionPage, ItemList, BreadcrumbList

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

81 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

81OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page18 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 1996.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 31 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: captured
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: captured
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

927 checks on 13 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

More sites like this: blog or news site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 13 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.