Scan a site

Loom

loom.com

Scanned Fresh925 checks

72OF 100
How it adds up →
In its own wordsLooks like: Company or service siteFree screen recorder for Mac and PC | LoomBest free online screen recording tool with advanced video editing and video storage trusted by over 22 million people and easy sharing from Loom.com.
PopularityTop 10KBuilt withSanity, Next.js, Tailwind CSS31 technologies foundTrust signals0 of 7 foundDomain registered 28 years agoBuilt with AI? None foundNo traces found

Loom (loom.com) looks like a company or service site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1997. It is built with Sanity, Next.js and Tailwind CSS; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #3,099 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #2,005

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#3,099list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 10,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#2,005list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Sanity, Next.js and Tailwind CSS and 2 more.

  • SanityCMSShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 20
    <meta content="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/pvn35iyy/production/6f62a5ee8e9e…
    Popular sites using Sanity Is this wrong? Report it
  • Next.jsFrameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 36
    <script src="/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js">
    Popular sites using Next.js Is this wrong? Report it
  • Tailwind CSSCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · stylesheet /_next/static/css/24bcd6f1be991f65.css
    …der-spacing-x:0;--tw-border-spacing-y:0;--tw-translate-x:0;--tw-translate-y:0;--tw-rotate:0;--…
    Popular sites using Tailwind CSS Is this wrong? Report it
  • EmotionCSS frameworkShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · page source, line 36
    68 attributes starting with data-emotion
    Popular sites using Emotion Is this wrong? Report it
  • VercelHostingShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-vercel-id: kix1::28wxq-1791895733715-daf7eec0edf8
    Popular sites using Vercel Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (26)

Around it: CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

0 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered4 Dec 1997, 28 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • About pageNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • TermsNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsName: Loom Inc.Partly
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • TrackersNone found on the home pageNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered4 Dec 1997, 28 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Company or service site.

In its own wordsFree screen recorder for Mac and PC | LoomBest free online screen recording tool with advanced video editing and video storage trusted by over 22 million people and easy sharing from Loom.com.

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · structured data
"@type": "Corporation"
Exhibit 2 · visible text
…d share AI-powered video messages with your teammates and customers to supercharge produ…
Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

  • structured dataLoom Inc.
  • WikidataLoom

Confirmed by 2 independent sources: structured data and Wikidata.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 20
"name": "Loom Inc."
Exhibit 2 · Wikidata
Q131738271: Loom
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Loom: screen recorder · browser extension, screencast

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

Its summary for AI assistantsLoom is part of Atlassian. Loom's data and content are accessible through Atlassian's Rovo platform. AI agents should connect to the Atlassian Remote MCP server rather than crawling this site.Read it in full

AI use

  • AI training: asks GPTBot to stay away.
  • AI training: names Amazonbot with rules for some pages.
  • AI assistants: may read it for the people who ask them.
Show evidence (2)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 6
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 10
User-agent: Amazonbot
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Loom
Language
English (en)
What it tells search engines
Corporation

Named in its structured data

  • CompanyLoom Inc.

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

72 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

72OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30no contact page link · email and phone not both given · no privacy policy link · no terms link · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · no about page link
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 28 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · no protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · tells search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1997.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

925 checks on 13 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#3,099list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 10,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#2,005list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CMS
Sanity
Framework
Next.js
CSS framework
Tailwind CSS, Emotion
Hosting
Vercel

And 26 more around it (CDN, DNS, Email, Tag manager), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageNot found
  • About pageNot found
  • Privacy policyNot found
  • TermsNot found
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsPartly
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactFound

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

72OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page4 / 30
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections13 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines10 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites like this: company or service site

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 13 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share loom.com

The result describes what we found on 13 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.