kicker.de
No scorethe page couldn’t be read
In WikidataKicker: German sports magazine
kicker
kicker.de looks like a blog or news site and is ranked in the top 10,000 sites. We couldn’t read its page: it turned our scanner away.
This site turns automated visitors away, as many large sites do, so we couldn’t read its page. What public records say is below; the score needs the page.
Popularity
Website Traffic CheckerAmong the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Top 1KTop 10KTop 100KTop 1MOutside top 1M
Tranco: #4,164 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #8,201
Each list, with its date
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #4,164 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #8,201 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Technology
Tech Stack CheckerNo framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.
Everything else it uses (9)
Around it: CDN, Security, DNS, Email and more.
CloudflareCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response headerPopular sites using Cloudflare Is this wrong? Report itcf-ray: a4a60b90283ce2d7-SEA
Amazon CloudFrontCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response headerPopular sites using Amazon CloudFront Is this wrong? Report itx-amz-cf-id: R7k4wAEEJGkbf_8NRGP784S-NzjH3cc6d75shq9bFay9Nti4N9bRgg==
DataDomeSecurityShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response headerPopular sites using DataDome Is this wrong? Report itx-datadome: protected
Amazon Route 53DNSShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Amazon Route 53 Is this wrong? Report itkicker.de NS ns-1297.awsdns-34.org.
Microsoft 365EmailShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Microsoft 365 Is this wrong? Report itkicker.de MX 0 kicker-de.mail.protection.outlook.com.
Amazon SESEmailShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Amazon SES Is this wrong? Report it…pf.protection.outlook.com ip4:45.66.84.0/24 ip4:213.206.185.37 ip4:45.139.158.9 include:amazonses.com include:spf.dsb.net -all
BrevoMarketingShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Brevo Is this wrong? Report itkicker.de TXT brevo-code:e09d9e43d8e705fdcf03fb07346ec6f5
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report itkicker.de TXT google-site-verification=6Vu77hBR0JOD2-WoT5wG2ePaRfzne7LD4l4at8DEPe8
AtlassianBusiness toolsShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS recordPopular sites using Atlassian Is this wrong? Report itkicker.de TXT atlassian-domain-verification=auBvl4dzyx12TXoasrYnQGuptTr8PJxMKiXXWv/AiuAGTj3a9gfGSwI/vh0Q254d
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
Trust signals
Website Trust CheckerWe couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at
On the site
- Contact pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- About pageBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- Privacy policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- TermsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- Refund or returns policyBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- Contact detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- Company detailsBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- Payment providersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
- TrackersBot protection hid the pageCouldn’t check
Behind the site
- Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
- Domain registeredThe registry publishes no registration date, only when the record last changed (4 Mar 2026)Couldn’t checkWHOIS (whois.denic.de)
- HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
- Protective settingsBot protection answered instead of the siteCouldn’t check
- Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
What it is
Website SummaryLooks like: Blog or news site.
We couldn’t read the page, so there are no words of its own to quote.
From what Wikidata says it is: we couldn’t read the page.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Is this wrong? Report itQ481190: Kicker, magazine
Who is behind it
- WikidataKicker
Wikidata: Based in Nuremberg, Germany.
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Is this wrong? Report itQ481190: Kicker
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts
In Wikidata
- Kicker: German sports magazine · magazine · since 1920
- kicker.de: German association football website · sports database, sports website, online database
Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of these items. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.
AI use
- AI training: asks GPTBot, Applebot-Extended, ClaudeBot, CCBot and 12 more to stay away.
- AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and Perplexity-User to stay away.
Show evidence (20)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 19
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 28
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 31
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 37
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 76
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 79
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 82
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 85
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 88
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 91
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 94
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 97
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 100
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 103
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 115
User-agent: DeepseekBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 118
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 22
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 34
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 106
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 109
Is this wrong? Report itUser-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
- Site name
- Not given
- Language
- Not given
- What it tells search engines
- None
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
Built with AI?
AI Website DetectorWe couldn’t read the page, so we couldn’t look for traces.
AI traces: Couldn’t check
How we know
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
Score breakdown
Site ScoreNo score: we couldn’t read the page, and outside records alone would mislead.
Why each part scored what it did
Domain history
Domain HistoryNo registration date or archive capture found.
- This scanCheckAnySite
The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
- Since our previous scan
- This is our first scan of the site.
How we scanned it
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
- Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
- With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
- Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers
924 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
More sites like this: blog or news site
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
What this scan can’t tell you
- Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
- Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
- How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
- Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.