Gov.pl
gov.pl
In its own wordsLooks like: Government or public bodyPortal Gov.pl
Gov.pl
In its own wordsLooks like: Government or public bodyPortal Gov.pl
gov.pl looks like a government or public body site, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 1995. It is built with Bootstrap and jQuery; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
Among the top 10K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #3,836 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #1,799
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #3,836 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #1,799 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with jQuery, jQuery UI and Modernizr and 1 more.
<script src="/scripts/vendors/jquery-3.7.1.min.js">
<script src="/scripts/vendors/jquery-ui-1.13.2.min.js">
<script src="/scripts/polyfills/modernizr-custom.js">
…ont-size:1.75rem;position:relative}/*! * Bootstrap v4.5.3 (https://getbootstrap.com/) * Copy…
Around it: CDN, SEO, Fonts.
cf-ray: a4a39b046b5b21d5-KIX
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="D55ECD200B1844DB56EFBA4DA551CF8D">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/fonts/font-awesome.min.css">
0 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
Looks like: Government or public body.
In its own wordsPortal Gov.pl
Our reading of the page, medium confidence.
https://www.gov.pl/
Wikidata: Based in Poland.
Q11781504: Ministry of Transportation (Poland)
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of these items. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
66 of 100: some trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 1995; first archived in 2004.
In the web archive: captured in 11 of 23 years · see the first capture
No captures 2005–2016: the site may have been offline or parked then, or the archive didn’t visit.
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
925 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.