gosuslugi.ru
In its own wordsПортал государственных услуг Российской ФедерацииПроще, чем кажется
In its own wordsПортал государственных услуг Российской ФедерацииПроще, чем кажется
gosuslugi.ru is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2008. It uses Cloudflare, Google Search Console and GlobalSign (certificates); we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before JavaScript runs. Sites drawn by JavaScript show fewer signals until we can render them in a browser.
Among the top 1K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #517 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #2,348
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #517 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 5,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #2,348 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, SEO, Business tools.
Around it: CDN, SEO, Business tools.
cf-ray: a487cda9bdd900a5-KIX
gosuslugi.ru TXT google-site-verification=sEP55rqJqRgqyS8gkR48f75z74rwykT_NBHKUVXwh14
gosuslugi.ru TXT _globalsign-domain-verification=--VNJf12X8NkcxuYkA74Oivp5rOF48Qtg7uKgZfZNJ
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
It calls itself “Портал государственных услуг Российской Федерации”.
In its own wordsПортал государственных услуг Российской ФедерацииПроще, чем кажется
The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).
User-agent: * · Disallow: /
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
88 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Scored on the parts we could check.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2008; first archived in 2009.
In the web archive: captured in 18 of 18 years · see the first capture
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
925 checks on 10 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 10 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.