Scan a site

dw.com is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 1994. It uses Cloudflare, Akamai and Microsoft 365; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

The page shows little text before JavaScript runs. Sites drawn by JavaScript show fewer signals until we can render them in a browser.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 1K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #1,425 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #435

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#1,425list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#435list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

No framework or CMS shows in the page; it uses CDN, Email, Monitoring, Business tools.

Everything else it uses (10)

Around it: CDN, Email, Monitoring, Business tools.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • Domain registered7 Dec 1994, 31 years agoNoted
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • About pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • Privacy policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • TermsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • Refund or returns policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • Contact detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • Company detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • Payment providersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
  • TrackersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registered7 Dec 1994, 31 years agoNoteddomain registry
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings3 of 6 in placePartly
  • Email protectionProtected against forged emailFoundDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

The page doesn’t say what it is.

The page has no title or description.

Why can this be empty?

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • WikidataDeutsche Welle

Wikidata: Based in Bonn, Germany.

Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · Wikidata
Q153770: Deutsche Welle
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

  • Deutsche Welle: international German public radio and television channel · broadcaster, public television station, mass media · since 1953
  • DW-TV: set of German television channels · television station, specialty channel · since 1992

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of these items. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

  • AI training: asks AI2Bot, Ai2Bot-Dolma, Amazonbot, anthropic-ai and 19 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks ChatGPT-User, meta-externalfetcher, OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and 1 more to stay away.
Show evidence (28)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 35
User-agent: Ai2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 38
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 41
User-agent: Amazonbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 44
User-agent: anthropic-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 50
User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 59
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 62
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 68
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 71
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 74
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 83
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 89
User-agent: FacebookBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 95
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 98
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 104
User-Agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 107
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 113
User-agent: Meta-ExternalAgent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 134
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 137
User-agent: omgilibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 164
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 170
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 173
User-agent: Webzio-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 179
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 65
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 116
User-agent: Meta-ExternalFetcher · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 131
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 146
User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · robots.txt, line 149
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
Not given
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

86 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

86OF 100
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines0 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 31 years ago
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 1K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines0 / 10site name differs from the domain · no description · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 1994; first archived in 1996.

  1. Domain registeredRDAP
  2. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  3. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 30 of 31 years · see the first capture

  1. 1996: captured
  2. 1997: captured
  3. 1998: captured
  4. 1999: captured
  5. 2000: captured
  6. 2001: captured
  7. 2002: captured
  8. 2003: captured
  9. 2004: captured
  10. 2005: captured
  11. 2006: captured
  12. 2007: captured
  13. 2008: captured
  14. 2009: captured
  15. 2010: captured
  16. 2011: captured
  17. 2012: captured
  18. 2013: no capture
  19. 2014: captured
  20. 2015: captured
  21. 2016: captured
  22. 2017: captured
  23. 2018: captured
  24. 2019: captured
  25. 2020: captured
  26. 2021: captured
  27. 2022: captured
  28. 2023: captured
  29. 2024: captured
  30. 2025: captured
  31. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

925 checks on 11 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 1KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#1,425list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 5,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#435list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

CDN
Cloudflare, Akamai
Email
Microsoft 365, Amazon SES
Monitoring
Akamai mPulse
Business tools
Apple Business, Adobe, Miro, Jamf, TeamViewer
Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageCouldn’t check
  • About pageCouldn’t check
  • Privacy policyCouldn’t check
  • TermsCouldn’t check
  • Refund or returns policyCouldn’t check
  • Contact detailsCouldn’t check
  • Company detailsCouldn’t check
  • Payment providersCouldn’t check
  • TrackersCouldn’t check

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersPartly
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupFound
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

86OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines0 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 11 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share dw.com

The result describes what we found on 11 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.