dailymotion.com
In its own wordsLooks like: Forum or communityDailymotion
In its own wordsLooks like: Forum or communityDailymotion
dailymotion.com looks like a forum or community, is ranked in the top 1,000 sites and was registered in 2005. It is built with Express and Envoy; we found no traces of an AI site builder.
The page shows little text before JavaScript runs. Sites drawn by JavaScript show fewer signals until we can render them in a browser.
Among the top 1K sites.
A popularity band, not a visit count.
Tranco: #434 · Chrome UX Report: Top 1,000 · Majestic Million: #261
| Source | Says | As of |
|---|---|---|
| TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily. | #434 | list of 7 Oct 2026 |
| Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly. | Top 1,000 | Aug 2026 |
| Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0 | #261 | list of 8 Oct 2026 |
Built with Express and Envoy.
x-envoy-upstream-service-time: 11
Around it: CDN, Email, Marketing, SEO and more.
x-amz-cf-id: ClNwVPCo5OcqIw_L9PrrmVr1bs9ZM3wvdyqxlXumIb_TNJ7ZKSTwDg==
dailymotion.com MX 1 smtp.google.com.
dailymotion.com TXT v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com include:spfa.dailymotion.co…
dailymotion.com TXT v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com include:spfa.dailymotion.com include:spfb.dailymotion.c…
dailymotion.com TXT google-site-verification=CmwXiGhZe_wN9v_ACMLi26gPNF8jMSiO7IIm3uJDflU
<meta name="msvalidate.01" content="42E38E6C5CF3C253563039FCD6F3F775">
dailymotion.com TXT facebook-domain-verification=12wxrtyxlslijcmfpit8f0fwtlywlz
dailymotion.com TXT apple-domain-verification=Xc0pXSUjiGdd6fzI
dailymotion.com TXT atlassian-domain-verification=1fQPUuD1xWMMiqUh4TDo7tO4mPlbE/ptj393wMdMtIRv5UXlZmKDb2cfLlApGCBs
dailymotion.com TXT docusign=c8b32be7-de71-4c64-a061-78cd9ef299ee
dailymotion.com TXT miro-verification=a02c054603f34e1def7bec67636b72d31e230cf4
dailymotion.com TXT jamf-site-verification=tyNylgsFuzDaZKhtv2ws8A
dailymotion.com TXT figma-domain-verification=cbb3b2f479e5448b33c1db6b92c0a5c13113593739aa38b3ab18f4e7dfcad023-1777467509
dailymotion.com TXT canva-site-verification=M-ynsH9PuwqgXIvdn1n6XA
dailymotion.com TXT notion-domain-verification=uvbWKKeyZnS8S7Wbx92ycOmg6ciLlUt4DXUbFAGGx9K
Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.
We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.
Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.
A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it
Looks like: Forum or community.
In its own wordsDailymotion
Our reading of the page, medium confidence.
Also has signs of: Video or music streaming.
Q769222: Dailymotion, online community
Wikidata: Part of Vivendi; based in Paris, France; founded by Olivier Poitrey and Benjamin Bejbaum.
Q769222: Dailymotion
Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.
Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.
Its summary for AI assistantsThe home for videos that matter - A global video platform where you can discover, watch, and share content that enriches and inspiresRead it in full
What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.
Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.
No AI builder traces found.
Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.
AI traces: None found
AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.
We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.
How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI
93 of 100: strong trust signals.
How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.
Scored on the parts we could check.
A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.
Registered in 2005; first archived in 2005.
In the web archive: captured in 22 of 22 years · see the first capture
| Scanned | Score | AI traces | Popularity |
|---|---|---|---|
| shown above | 93 | None found | Top 1K |
| 93 | None found | Top 1K |
Findings can change when a site changes or when we update our signatures; each scan keeps the version it used.
Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.
925 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.
Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error
Is this your site? Ask for a correction.