Band

band.us

Scanned 14 Oct 2026Fresh925 checks

In its own wordsLooks like: Software or appBAND – The App For GroupsWhere Leaders Communicate Better

Band (band.us) looks like a software product or app, is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was registered in 2002. It is built with Java and Lottie; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

The page shows little text before JavaScript runs. Sites drawn by JavaScript show fewer signals until we can render them in a browser.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Top 1KTop 10KTop 100KTop 1MOutside top 1M

Tranco: #4,770 · Chrome UX Report: Top 10,000 · Majestic Million: #3,852

Each list, with its date

Source	Says	As of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.	#4,770	list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.	Top 10,000	Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0	#3,852	list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Lottie and Java.

LottieJavaScript libraryShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · page source, line 389
```
<script src="https://ssl.pstatic.net/static/bandweb/static/band-web/lottie-web-5.12.2.min.js">
```
Popular sites using Lottie Is this wrong? Report it
JavaLanguageShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
set-cookie: JSESSIONID=…
```
Popular sites using Java Is this wrong? Report it

Everything else it uses (2)

Around it: CDN, SEO.

CloudflareCDNShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · response header
```
cf-ray: a4aa7efc4f118f09-TPE
```
Popular sites using Cloudflare Is this wrong? Report it
Google Search ConsoleSEOShow evidenceHide evidence
Evidence · DNS record
```
band.us TXT google-site-verification=UVwfj29NdwllsnRdaQBmJIaKStoEn119D8wbaITrCDc
```
Popular sites using Google Search Console Is this wrong? Report it

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

We couldn’t read the page; outside records are below.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Domain registered29 Apr 2002, 24 years agoNoted
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted

Every signal we looked at

On the site

Contact pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
About pageThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Privacy policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
TermsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Refund or returns policyThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Contact detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Company detailsThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
Payment providersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check
TrackersThe page shows little text before its JavaScript runsCouldn’t check

Behind the site

Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
Domain registered29 Apr 2002, 24 years agoNotedWHOIS (whois.nic.us)
HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
Protective settings4 of 6 in placeFound
Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

Looks like: Software or app.

In its own wordsBAND – The App For GroupsWhere Leaders Communicate Better

Our reading of the page, medium confidence.

Show evidence (2)Hide evidence

Exhibit 1 · Wikidata

Q16179842: BAND, mobile app

Exhibit 2 · its own title or description

BAND – The App For Groups · Where Leaders Communicate Better

Is this wrong? Report it

Who is behind it

WikidataBAND

Show evidenceHide evidence

Exhibit 1 · Wikidata

Q16179842: BAND

Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

In Wikidata

BAND: mobile application · mobile app

Wikidata, the free knowledge base behind Wikipedia, lists this domain as the official website of this item. Volunteers write it; each item shows its sources.

AI use

AI training: asks GPTBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot, meta-externalagent and 2 more to stay away.
AI assistants: asks OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and Claude-SearchBot to stay away.

Show evidence (9)Hide evidence

Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 17

User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /

Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 20

User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /

Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 21

User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /

Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 23

User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /

Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 24

User-agent: Applebot-Extended · Disallow: /

Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 25

User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /

Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 18

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /

Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 19

User-agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /

Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 22

User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /

Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name: Band
Language: English (en)
What it tells search engines: None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

96 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did

Track recordHow long the domain has existed25 / 25domain registered 24 years ago

PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list

Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings

ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

Registered in 2002.

29 Apr 2002Domain registeredWHOIS (whois.nic.us)
14 Oct 2026This scanCheckAnySite

The web archive couldn’t be reached; we’ll ask it again. Why can this be empty?

Changes, earlier scans and alerts

Since our previous scan: This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.

This scan, in numbers

925 checks on 14 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Questions about band.us

What is band.us?

Band describes itself: “Where Leaders Communicate Better” It looks like a software product or app. See the evidence

How old is band.us?

Its domain was registered on 29 Apr 2002, 24 years ago. See the evidence

What is band.us built with?

It is built with Java and Lottie; we found 4 technologies in all. See the evidence

How popular is band.us?

It is among the top 10,000 sites, by Tranco, Chrome UX Report and Majestic Million. See the evidence

Was band.us made with AI?

We found no traces of an AI site builder. That doesn’t prove a person built it: AI coding assistants leave no traces. See the evidence

Who is behind band.us?

Wikidata names BAND. See the evidence

More sites like this: software or app

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 14 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you

Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.