Scan a site

amazon.nl is ranked in the top 10,000 sites and was first seen by the web archive in 2000. It is built with Amazon Web Services; we found no traces of an AI site builder.

Popularity

Website Traffic Checker

Among the top 10K sites.

A popularity band, not a visit count.

Tranco: #3,541 · Chrome UX Report: Top 5,000 · Majestic Million: #5,915

Each list, with its date
SourceSaysAs of
TrancoA research ranking that combines several traffic and link sources, published daily.#3,541list of 7 Oct 2026
Chrome UX ReportRank buckets from Google’s real Chrome traffic, published monthly.Top 5,000Aug 2026
Majestic MillionRanks sites by how many separate networks link to them (links, not visits), published daily. CC BY 3.0#5,915list of 8 Oct 2026

Technology

Tech Stack Checker

Built with Amazon Web Services.

  • Amazon Web ServicesHostingShow evidenceHide evidence
    Evidence · response header
    x-amz-rid: 8XDDYACSPA5BQXVRDTZE
    Popular sites using Amazon Web Services Is this wrong? Report it
Everything else it uses (19)

Around it: CDN, Email, Advertising, SEO and more.

Business tools can stay listed after a site stops using them.

Trust signals

Website Trust Checker

4 of 7 trust signals found on the home page.

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNoted
Every signal we looked at

On the site

  • Contact pageLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • About pageLinked from the home pageFound
  • Privacy policyLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • TermsLinked from the home page; it turned our scanner away (403), so we couldn’t open itFound
  • Refund or returns policyNo link found on the home pageNot found
  • Contact detailsNo email or phone on the home pageNot found
  • Company detailsNo company name or address foundNot found
  • Payment providersNone on the home pageNoted
  • Trackers1 analytics and advertising tool: Amazon AdsNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNot blocked by Cloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filterNotedCloudflare’s security filter and Quad9’s security filter
  • Domain registeredThe registry didn’t answerCouldn’t checkdomain registry
  • First seen online11 May 2000, 26 years agoNotedInternet Archive
  • HTTPSLoads over HTTPS with a valid certificateFound
  • Protective settings5 of 6 in placeFound
  • Email protectionPartly protected against forged emailPartlyDNS records

A second opinion on its security setup: Mozilla’s HTTP Observatory grades the site when you open it. Ten checks before you buy · A signal looks wrong? Report it

What it is

Website Summary

It calls itself “Amazon.nl: Large range, small prices for electronics, books, sports and more”.

In its own wordsAmazon.nl: Large range, small prices for electronics, books, sports and moreOnline store for electronics, computers, clothing, shoes, toys, books, sports, beauty, personal care and more.

The page doesn’t show enough to say what kind of site it is (a shop, a blog, an app…).

Who is behind it

  • copyright lineAmazon.com, Inc
Show evidenceHide evidence
Exhibit 1 · page source, line 1703
© 1996-2025, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates
Is this wrong? Report it

Each name is quoted from its source. A brand and the company that owns it often go by different names.

More about it: Wikidata, profiles, AI use, page facts

AI use

  • AI training: asks GPTBot, CCBot, Google-Extended, ClaudeBot and 24 more to stay away.
  • AI assistants: asks PerplexityBot, MistralAI-User, DuckAssistBot, Google-CloudVertexBot and 8 more to stay away.
Show evidence (40)Hide evidence
Exhibit 1 · robots.txt, line 105
User-agent: GPTBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 2 · robots.txt, line 108
User-agent: CCBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 3 · robots.txt, line 114
User-agent: Google-Extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 4 · robots.txt, line 123
User-agent: ClaudeBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 5 · robots.txt, line 126
User-agent: meta-externalagent · Disallow: /
Exhibit 6 · robots.txt, line 129
User-agent: Bytespider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 7 · robots.txt, line 141
User-agent: omgili · Disallow: /
Exhibit 8 · robots.txt, line 144
User-agent: AI2Bot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 9 · robots.txt, line 150
User-agent: PanguBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 10 · robots.txt, line 156
User-agent: Diffbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 11 · robots.txt, line 171
User-agent: Ai2Bot-Dolma · Disallow: /
Exhibit 12 · robots.txt, line 189
User-agent: cohere-ai · Disallow: /
Exhibit 13 · robots.txt, line 195
User-agent: img2dataset · Disallow: /
Exhibit 14 · robots.txt, line 198
User-agent: VelenPublicWebCrawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 15 · robots.txt, line 201
User-agent: YouBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 16 · robots.txt, line 204
User-agent: Brightbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 17 · robots.txt, line 240
User-agent: Timpibot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 18 · robots.txt, line 267
User-agent: ChatGLM-Spider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 19 · robots.txt, line 270
User-agent: Claude-Web · Disallow: /
Exhibit 20 · robots.txt, line 279
User-agent: cohere-training-data-crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 21 · robots.txt, line 282
User-agent: Cotoyogi · Disallow: /
Exhibit 22 · robots.txt, line 291
User-agent: DeepSeekBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 23 · robots.txt, line 300
User-agent: factset_spyderbot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 24 · robots.txt, line 321
User-agent: ICC-Crawler · Disallow: /
Exhibit 25 · robots.txt, line 324
User-agent: ImagesiftBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 26 · robots.txt, line 339
User-agent: laion-huggingface-processor · Disallow: /
Exhibit 27 · robots.txt, line 372
User-agent: SBIntuitionsBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 28 · robots.txt, line 387
User-agent: webzio-extended · Disallow: /
Exhibit 29 · robots.txt, line 111
User-Agent: PerplexityBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 30 · robots.txt, line 153
User-agent: MistralAI-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 31 · robots.txt, line 165
User-agent: DuckAssistBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 32 · robots.txt, line 174
User-agent: Google-CloudVertexBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 33 · robots.txt, line 177
User-agent: meta-externalfetcher · Disallow: /
Exhibit 34 · robots.txt, line 180
User-agent: iaskspider · Disallow: /
Exhibit 35 · robots.txt, line 207
User-agent: Claude-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 36 · robots.txt, line 213
User-agent: Claude-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 37 · robots.txt, line 216
User-agent: Perplexity-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 38 · robots.txt, line 234
User-agent: ChatGPT-User · Disallow: /
Exhibit 39 · robots.txt, line 237
User-agent: OAI-SearchBot · Disallow: /
Exhibit 40 · robots.txt, line 351
User-agent: meta-webindexer · Disallow: /
Is this wrong? Report it

What its robots.txt and robots tags ask of AI crawlers. Each crawler chooses whether to follow it.

Site name
Not given
Language
English (en-gb)
What it tells search engines
None

Read from what the page says about itself; we haven’t checked whether it’s true.

Built with AI?

AI Website Detector

No AI builder traces found.

Coding tools such as Cursor leave no traces, so this doesn’t mean a person made it.

AI traces: None found

How we know

AI site builders leave traces in the sites they make. We look for the traces of 53 of them and show every match with the line it came from, so you can check it yourself.

We test this on 2,312 sites whose makers we know, and publish what we get wrong.

How we test it · Every builder we know · How to tell if a site was built with AI

Score breakdown

Site Score

91 of 100: strong trust signals.

How established and checkable it is; AI traces carry no weight.

91OF 100
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10

Scored on the parts we could check.

Why each part scored what it did
TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30contact page linked · email and phone not both given · privacy policy linked · terms linked · no payments seen, so no refund policy needed · about page linked
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20Top 10K in a popularity list
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15loads over HTTPS · sends visitors to HTTPS · always uses HTTPS · protective settings
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10site name matches the domain · describes itself · doesn’t tell search engines what it is

A high score isn’t a promise that a business is honest. How the score works.

Domain history

Domain History

First archived in 2000.

  1. First captured by the web archiveInternet Archive
  2. This scanCheckAnySite

In the web archive: captured in 27 of 27 years · see the first capture

  1. 2000: captured
  2. 2001: captured
  3. 2002: captured
  4. 2003: captured
  5. 2004: captured
  6. 2005: captured
  7. 2006: captured
  8. 2007: captured
  9. 2008: captured
  10. 2009: captured
  11. 2010: captured
  12. 2011: captured
  13. 2012: captured
  14. 2013: captured
  15. 2014: captured
  16. 2015: captured
  17. 2016: captured
  18. 2017: captured
  19. 2018: captured
  20. 2019: captured
  21. 2020: captured
  22. 2021: captured
  23. 2022: captured
  24. 2023: captured
  25. 2024: captured
  26. 2025: captured
  27. 2026: captured
Changes, earlier scans and alerts
Since our previous scan
This is our first scan of the site.

How we scanned it

Only from what anyone can see: the site’s public pages and public records.

  • Politely. Our scanner, CheckAnySiteBot, says who it is and follows the site’s robots.txt.
  • With sources. Every fact above says where it came from and when.
  • Without guessing. When we couldn’t check something, we say so.
This scan, in numbers

928 checks on 13 Oct 2026, with version 0.5.0 of our checks and version 1.1 of the score.

How we work · What each version changed · About our scanner

Quick look

Built with AI?

None foundWe found no AI builder traces.

“None found” never means “made by a person”: coding assistants leave no traces.

All the evidence →

Related

Quick look

How popular is it?

Top 10KBy the best of 3 public lists.

  • Tranco#3,541list of 7 Oct 2026
  • Chrome UX ReportTop 5,000Aug 2026
  • Majestic Million#5,915list of 8 Oct 2026

A popularity band, never a visit count.

The popularity section →

Related

Quick look

What is it built with?

Hosting
Amazon Web Services

And 19 more around it (CDN, Email, Advertising, SEO), in the section.

Each with its evidence →

Related

Quick look

Which trust signals does it show?

On the site

  • Contact pageFound
  • About pageFound
  • Privacy policyFound
  • TermsFound
  • Refund or returns policyNot found
  • Contact detailsNot found
  • Company detailsNot found
  • Payment providersNoted
  • TrackersNoted

Behind the site

  • Security filterNoted
  • Domain registeredCouldn’t check
  • First seen onlineNoted
  • HTTPSFound
  • Security headersFound
  • Software versionsNoted
  • NetworkNoted
  • Email setupPartly
  • First certificateCouldn’t check
  • DNSSECNot found
  • Certificate authoritiesNot found
  • Security contactNot found

Signals, not a judgement: missing details are common on small, honest sites.

Every signal with its source →

Related

How has it changed? →
Quick look

How does it add up?

91OF 100

Strong trust signals. An open formula (v1.1): every point comes from a finding above. AI traces carry no weight.

TransparencyContact, policies and about page26 / 30
PopularityIts place in public rankings20 / 20
Security and setupHTTPS and standard protections15 / 15
ConsistencyName, description and what it tells search engines7 / 10
Why each part scored what it did →

Related

More sites near it in popularity

Automated findings from the site’s public home page and public records, as of 13 Oct 2026. They describe what we found, not the people or business behind the site, and they may be incomplete or out of date. This is information, not advice. Terms · Report an error

What this scan can’t tell you
  • Whether the business is real, honest or delivers what it sells.
  • Whether a site was made with AI when no traces were left: coding assistants and hand edits leave none.
  • How many people visit: we show popularity bands from public lists, not visits.
  • Anything beyond the home page as it was at the time of the scan.

Is this your site? Ask for a correction.

Share this result

Share amazon.nl

The result describes what we found on 13 Oct 2026, with evidence.

Side by side

Compare with another site

AI traces, popularity, trust signals and the score, side by side.

Free scan · no sign-up

What do you want to find out?

Or check one thing:

Try

One scan answers everything: AI traces, popularity, technology, trust signals, how the site describes itself, a score and its history. A quick check only decides which answer comes first. We read public pages as CheckAnySiteBot and follow robots.txt.